What 395.22(b) means in plain language
Your electronic logging device (ELD) is designed to create a digital record of your hours of service. However, the ELD itself is only part of the system. Federal regulations require that your motor carrier—not just you, but your employer—must keep supporting documents that back up what the ELD shows.
These supporting documents might include fuel receipts, load logs, delivery confirmations, repair records, or other paperwork that independently verifies the activities recorded in your ELD. The rule is straightforward: if your ELD says you drove from Point A to Point B during a certain time window, the carrier needs to have corroborating documentation on file.
When an inspector cites a carrier for 395.22(b), it typically means the roadside inspection found ELD records that lacked the paper trail or electronic proof to support them. This is a carrier-level violation—the responsibility sits with your employer to collect and organize these documents—but it affects your records, your safety file, and your company's CSA scores.
What our enforcement data actually shows
Our inspection records show that 395.22(b) is extremely rare in roadside enforcement. Across our database of 13 million+ inspections, we have recorded zero citations for this code all-time, zero in the last 12 months, and zero in the last 90 days.
Because no out-of-service decisions have been issued under this code in our records, the out-of-service rate is 0.0%. This does not mean the violation never occurs—it suggests that when carriers lack sufficient supporting documents for ELD records, the violation is either being cited under a related code, being handled through administrative or audit channels rather than roadside inspection, or is extremely uncommon in practice.
The near-absence of citations does not mean you should ignore the requirement. It may instead reflect that most carriers and drivers who use ELDs are adequately maintaining supporting documents, or that inspectors and carriers are resolving documentation gaps through remedial action rather than formal citation.
Who gets cited most
Because our data shows zero citations for 395.22(b) across all states and carriers, we cannot identify geographic or fleet-specific enforcement patterns. No state has been cited under this code in our 13 million+ inspection records, and no carrier has a documented citation history for this violation.
This zero-citation pattern is notable when compared to other hours-of-service codes in the same regulatory family, which do see measurable enforcement activity.
How severe is this compared to similar codes
The hours-of-service category contains many related violations that are cited far more frequently and carry different severity profiles.
395.24 — ELD Form and Manner has 106,486 all-time citations with a 0.0% out-of-service rate. This code addresses defects in how the ELD itself is formatted or operated—a much more common finding during roadside inspection.
395.8(a)(1) — Not using the appropriate method to record hours of service carries 39,561 citations and a 93.2% out-of-service rate. This violation is more severe and more commonly enforced; it captures cases where a driver or carrier is not using an approved ELD or paper RODS method at all.
395.8(e)(1) has 78,276 citations and a 26.0% out-of-service rate, placing it in the middle tier for both frequency and out-of-service risk. This code addresses record-of-duty-status violations more broadly.
The absence of any citations for 395.22(b) places it outside the enforcement mainstream, even within the hours-of-service family. When violations related to ELD documentation occur, inspectors and carriers appear to address them under broader codes like 395.24 or 395.8(a)(1), which carry clearer OOS consequences.
How to avoid it
Although 395.22(b) citations are not showing up in roadside enforcement, the regulation remains binding. Here are concrete steps your carrier and you can take to stay compliant:
-
Confirm your carrier has a document-retention system in place. Before you begin a trip, verify that your company has a process for capturing and filing supporting documents (fuel receipts, logbook entries, delivery photos, dispatch confirmations) that correspond to your ELD record. Ask your safety manager or dispatcher how long these documents are kept and where.
-
Collect and retain receipts during every trip. Keep fuel receipts, tolls, parking tickets, motel receipts, and scale tickets. These are the most common supporting documents inspectors expect. Save them in a folder or transmit them through your carrier's app immediately after each transaction.
-
Photograph or document load-related activities. If you pick up or drop off a load, photograph the bill of lading, seal numbers, or dock stamps. Upload these images through your carrier's system so a clear audit trail links your ELD entry to the physical event.
-
Verify ELD accuracy before certifying. Before you electronically certify your daily record, review it against your receipts and notes. If the ELD shows a time or location that doesn't match your receipts, flag it to your dispatcher or safety team. Correct it before submission.
-
Maintain communication with dispatch. If your carrier uses a dispatch system separate from your ELD, ensure both systems are synchronized. Mismatches between dispatch logs and ELD records create gaps in supporting documentation.
-
Report documentation gaps immediately. If you notice that your carrier is not collecting receipts or that you cannot find supporting documents for a trip you completed, notify your safety manager. The longer a gap persists, the harder it becomes to reconstruct the documentation later.
These actions are not just defensive. Solid supporting documentation makes it easier to resolve disputes during audits, prove your innocence if a dispute arises, and demonstrate to regulators that your carrier runs a professional operation.