FMCSR 395.20B: Short-Haul Timecard Citation Guide

You were cited for 395.20B—not maintaining required time records for short-haul operations. Here's what the data shows about enforcement, consequences, and how to prevent it.

Severity Weight
3
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Hours of Service
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
395.20B
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Hours of Service
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
3

Ranks #1,066 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Motor carrier not maintaining required time records for short-haul drivers.

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 395.20B means in plain language

FMCSR 395.20B addresses a specific requirement for short-haul drivers: maintaining accurate time records that document when you're on duty, off duty, driving, and on break. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration defines short-haul operations as driving within a 100-air-mile radius from your carrier's main terminal, and the rule applies when your carrier has opted into short-haul record-keeping methods instead of the standard electronic logging device (ELD) system.

The citation you received means an inspector found that your carrier—or you as the driver—failed to keep the required time records for your short-haul duties. This could mean missing entries, incomplete annotations, or records that don't align with your actual driving activity. Unlike violations of more complex ELD rules, this is a straightforward paperwork compliance issue: the record either exists and is complete, or it doesn't.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across our 13 million+ inspection records, 395.20B is cited rarely compared to the broader Hours of Service category. In the last 90 days, we recorded 56 citations for this code. Over the last 12 months, the total reached 228 citations, and all-time, 337 drivers or carriers have been cited for it. This makes 395.20B ranked 1050th out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume—well below the enforcement spotlight.

The most striking data point: zero out-of-service orders have been issued for 395.20B in our entire dataset. The out-of-service rate is 0.0%, compared to an all-FMCSR average OOS rate of 31.4%. This means inspectors are consistently treating this violation as a citation-only infraction, not pulling you off the road. Your immediate safety to operate is not in question from this violation alone.

Who gets cited most

Our inspection records show Iowa dominates enforcement for this code. In the last 180 days, Iowa accounted for 83 citations with a 0.0% out-of-service rate. Texas follows at 19 citations (0.0% OOS), and Illinois at 5 citations (0.0% OOS). North Carolina rounds out the top four with 4 citations. All four states show zero out-of-service orders, confirming the pattern that this violation is enforced as a recordkeeping citation without immediate vehicle removal.

Our data shows fleets such as Soldier Trucking LLC with 7 all-time citations and West Carriers LLC with 5 citations have seen this violation more than others. This does not imply systematic negligence—it may reflect these carriers' operational footprint in high-inspection regions or their use of short-haul operating authority.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

Within the Hours of Service category, 395.20B sits at the low-enforcement end. For context, 395.24 (ELD Form and Manner violations) has generated 106,486 citations with a 0.0% OOS rate, indicating it's a high-volume paperwork citation similar to yours but more commonly cited. False record of duty status (395.8E) has 83,660 citations with a 9.6% OOS rate, showing that substantive duty-status falsification carries higher enforcement pressure. The closest peer, 395.30B1 (driver failure to certify ELD accuracy), has 70,864 citations and a 0.0% OOS rate—nearly identical to your code in enforcement outcome.

In short: you are not facing a severe violation category. The citation is about documentation completeness, not safety failure.

How to avoid it

Your citation was likely issued alongside other record-related violations. Our data from the last 90 days shows that 395.20B commonly co-occurs with 395.24C2III (failing to add shipping document numbers, 12 shared inspections), 395.8E (false record of duty status, 10 shared inspections), and 395.24C1I (failing to make required annotations, 9 shared inspections). These patterns point to one root cause: incomplete or missing annotations in your time records.

Before each shift:

  • Confirm your carrier has provided you with the correct short-haul record form (paper or digital).
  • Review the form's required fields: start time, end time, duty status changes, vehicle number, and any required shipping document references.
  • Understand your carrier's annotation policy. If you switch duty status mid-shift (e.g., off-duty to driving to on-duty), you must record the time and reason.

During your shift:

  • Record every duty status change in real time. Do not wait until the end of the day.
  • If you haul freight, write down the shipping document number (bill of lading, purchase order, or manifest reference) when you pick it up.
  • If your equipment has changed (different trailer, different truck), note the new vehicle identification number on your record.
  • If road conditions, weather, or vehicle issues cause you to rest, mark yourself off-duty and note the reason if your carrier requires it.

At the end of your shift:

  • Review your record for completeness before signing or submitting it.
  • Cross-check the total hours: on-duty, driving, and off-duty should align with your clock time.
  • Ensure your name, date, vehicle number, and carrier information are legible and correct.

The vehicles most often cited for this violation in our data include Freightliner (124 citations), Utility trailers (74 citations), and Volvo tractors (52 citations). This distribution reflects these vehicles' prevalence in fleets, not a defect in the vehicles themselves. The issue is driver-side: short-haul drivers operating these common units must be especially diligent about their paperwork.

If your carrier uses paper short-haul records, ask if they offer training on the form. If they use a digital system, request access to a user guide or test the system before your first run. The citation you received is preventable with focused attention to record-keeping routine.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T14:48:57.067Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 395.20B Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 395.20B is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Iowa
45
OOS 0.0%
2. Texas
16
OOS 0.0%
3. Illinois
7
OOS 0.0%
4. North Carolina
1
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.