392.9B2-DFICD: Cargo Inspection Citation Explained

You were cited for failing to inspect cargo and tie-downs within 50 miles of trip start. Here's what the data shows about enforcement and how to avoid it next time.

Severity Weight
N/A
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Unsafe Driving
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
392.9B2-DFICD
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Unsafe Driving
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
N/A

Ranks #1,361 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.7% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Driver - Failing to inspect the cargo and devices used to secure the cargo within the first 50 miles after beginning a trip

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 392.9B2-DFICD means in plain language

This citation means an inspector found that you did not inspect your cargo and the devices securing it within the first 50 miles after starting your trip. The regulation requires drivers to perform this check early on—before cargo has a chance to shift, straps to loosen, or securing devices to fail in transit.

Inspectors typically catch this violation during roadside stops in the first portion of a route. They're looking for evidence that you stopped, walked the load, checked that tie-downs were tight and intact, and confirmed nothing was moving or at risk. If the inspector has reason to believe this check didn't happen, or happened too late in your trip, they will cite you.

This is a straightforward operational violation: it's about compliance with a mandatory pre-trip duty, not about the actual condition of the cargo at the moment of inspection.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across 13 million+ roadside inspections in our database, 392.9B2-DFICD citations are relatively uncommon. All-time, we have recorded 111 citations for this code. Over the last 12 months, the rate has been 77 citations, and in the last 90 days, 23 citations. This ranks 392.9B2-DFICD at #1387 of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume—it is not a heavily enforced violation.

Most critically: out-of-service (OOS) rates for this code are extremely low. Of the 111 all-time citations, only 1 driver was placed out of service, for an OOS rate of 0.9%. This is dramatically below the all-FMCSR average of 31.4%. In other words, inspectors do not treat this violation as an immediate safety threat. You will almost certainly not lose your driving authority from a single citation, and your operation can continue.

The monthly trend over the last 12 months shows fluctuation, with peaks in June (8 citations), August (8 citations), September (13 citations), and February 2026 (11 citations). There is no strong seasonal pattern that would predict when you are at highest risk.

Who gets cited most

Our inspection records show Alabama leads enforcement for this code, with 11 citations in the last 180 days and a 0.0% OOS rate. Pennsylvania follows with 8 citations, also 0.0% OOS. Massachusetts has 4 citations, also 0.0% OOS. These three states account for the majority of recent citations.

No meaningful variation exists in OOS outcomes across these states—all three have zero out-of-service placements, which is consistent with the national pattern for this code. If you drive in Alabama, Pennsylvania, or Massachusetts, you are statistically more likely to encounter this citation, but the consequence profile remains low severity.

Regarding carriers, our data shows individual fleets have very few citations. The highest count is 1 citation per carrier among the top ten, meaning no single trucking operation has a pattern of repeat violations for this code. This suggests the violation is scattered across the industry rather than concentrated in specific fleet cultures or practices.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

This code sits in the Unsafe Driving category. Compare it to the peer codes most frequently cited in that category:

392.2 — Operating a CMV while ill or fatigued has 1,208,164 citations all-time with a 0.8% OOS rate. This is roughly 10,000 times more frequent than 392.9B2-DFICD, indicating fatigue violations are a major enforcement priority and roughly equally likely to result in OOS action.

392.2-SLLSR — Operating a CMV while ill or fatigued (a subtype) has 191,232 citations with a 0.1% OOS rate—also far more common, and even less likely to trigger OOS.

The takeaway: 392.9B2-DFICD is a low-frequency violation with a low-severity outcome compared to almost all peer codes in the same safety category. It is not treated as a serious driving violation by enforcement.

How to avoid it

The data pattern tells us exactly what to watch. Our inspection records show that when 392.9B2-DFICD is cited, other cargo-related violations frequently appear in the same inspection:

  • Cargo securement—damaged tie-downs co-occurred in 6 shared inspections over the last 90 days. Action: Before you roll out, physically inspect every strap, chain, binder, or wire securing your load. Look for tears, corrosion, bent D-rings, or fraying. If a strap is damaged, do not use it. Replace it.

  • Cargo securement—logs co-occurred in 3 inspections. Action: If your load includes logs or dimensional freight, verify straps are routed correctly and tightened. Use load locks or edge protectors if the cargo is liable to shift.

  • Cargo securement—roll-on/roll-off containers co-occurred in 3 inspections. Action: If moving container freight, confirm the container is fully seated on the chassis and all pins or twist-locks are secured.

  • Missing proof of periodic vehicle inspection co-occurred in 4 inspections. Action: Carry your inspection documentation with you and verify your vehicle passed its last periodic inspection before departure.

  • Emergency equipment violations (warning devices, fire extinguishers) co-occurred in 7 total inspections. Action: Perform a full pre-trip vehicle walkaround, including triangles or flashers, fire extinguisher, spare bulbs, and fuses.

The single most practical step: Stop within the first 50 miles of any loaded trip. Get out, walk the load, and physically check every securing device. Tug on straps. Ensure nothing is loose, missing, or corroded. This 15-minute habit eliminates the citation entirely. The violation exists because inspectors have no evidence you did this check—so make it visible and routine.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T15:24:54.954Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 392.9B2-DFICD Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 392.9B2-DFICD is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Alabama
14
OOS 0.0%
2. Pennsylvania
7
OOS 0.0%
3. Massachusetts
6
OOS 0.0%
4. Kentucky
4
OOS 0.0%
5. California
4
OOS 0.0%
6. New Jersey
3
OOS 0.0%
7. Connecticut
1
OOS 0.0%
8. Colorado
1
OOS 0.0%
9. Arizona
1
OOS 0.0%
10. Oklahoma
1
OOS 0.0%
11. Arkansas
1
OOS 0.0%
12. South Carolina
1
OOS 0.0%
13. Tennessee
1
OOS 0.0%
14. Texas
1
OOS 0.0%
15. Virginia
1
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.