390.6-COERCION: What You Need to Know

You were cited for coercion under FMCSR 390.6. Learn what this violation means, how often it's enforced, and what happens next based on 13 million+ inspection records.

Severity Weight
N/A
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
General/Admin
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
390.6-COERCION
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
General/Admin
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
N/A

Ranks #1,367 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.8% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Carrier - A motor carrier or its agents, officers, or representatives, may not coerce a driver of a commercial motor vehicle to operate such vehicle in violation.

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 390.6-COERCION means in plain language

FMCSR 390.6 prohibits a motor carrier or any person from coercing a commercial motor vehicle operator. In practical terms, this means your employer cannot pressure you, threaten you, or take retaliatory action against you for refusing to operate a vehicle in violation of safety regulations, for reporting safety violations, or for exercising rights protected under federal motor carrier safety rules.

Coercion can take many forms: requiring you to drive beyond hours-of-service limits to meet a deadline, ordering you to operate an unsafe vehicle, punishing you for refusing an unsafe load, or threatening your job if you report maintenance problems. The regulation exists specifically to prevent carriers from using economic pressure to override safety decisions.

If you were cited for 390.6, it typically means an inspector found evidence that your carrier coerced you or other drivers. This could come from your own statement during inspection, company records reviewed by FMCSA, or a pattern of unsafe operations traced back to carrier pressure.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across our 13 million+ inspection records, 390.6-COERCION ranks #1379 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume. The enforcement numbers are relatively low: 115 all-time citations, 98 in the last 12 months, and 20 in the last 90 days.

What makes this code notable is its out-of-service rate. Our data shows that 390.6-COERCION has a 0.9% out-of-service rate—meaning only 1 driver out of 114 cited was placed out of service. This is significantly lower than the all-FMCSR average of 31.4%, which reflects that coercion citations typically result in warnings or carrier-level corrective actions rather than immediate vehicle or driver removal from service.

The monthly trend over the past 12 months shows activity peaked in August 2025 with 18 citations, and has since moderated to roughly 5–12 citations per month.

Who gets cited most

Our inspection records show geographic variation in 390.6 enforcement. Missouri leads with 16 citations in the last 180 days, followed by Wisconsin with 10 citations, and California with 7 citations. All three states show a 0.0% out-of-service rate, consistent with the national pattern for this code.

Among carriers in our database, Fremont Trans Inc (USDOT 2820179) appears most frequently with 4 all-time citations for 390.6. Several fleets such as PM Logistics Corp, Wilde Auto and Recovery LLC, and Rush Lines Inc each show 2 citations. This distribution does not suggest systematic coercion across any single carrier, but rather scattered incidents across the industry.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

390.6-COERCION occupies a distinct category within General/Admin violations. To contextualize its severity, compare it to nearby codes:

  • 390.21TB2-DOT has 74,663 citations with a 0.0% OOS rate—far higher volume but equally low enforcement severity.
  • 390.21TB1-MC (marking-related) shows 59,189 citations and 0.0% OOS rate, indicating administrative-level citations dominate the General/Admin category.
  • 390.21(a) (vehicle marking requirements) has 25,872 citations and 0.0% OOS rate.

390.6-COERCION is a low-frequency, low-severity enforcement action when compared by OOS rate, but its rarity underscores that inspectors and FMCSA investigators treat coercion allegations seriously and reserve citation for clear evidence of carrier pressure.

How to avoid it

When a citation for 390.6 appears, it typically reflects a carrier-level problem rather than a driver error. However, you can take steps to protect yourself and document safety-first operations:

  • Refuse unsafe operations in writing. If your carrier orders you to drive beyond hours-of-service limits, operate an unsafe vehicle, or skip required inspections, respond in writing (email, text, or recorded statement). This creates a record that you did not consent to the coercion.
  • Report maintenance defects before departure. Our inspection data shows that 393.9A-Inoperable required lamps and other equipment violations co-occur with 390.6 citations. Complete a thorough pre-trip inspection and document any defects. Do not leave the facility until maintenance is addressed.
  • Monitor hours-of-service closely. Coercion often involves pressure to exceed HOS limits. The co-occurrence of 395.8A1-HOSP (failing to maintain records of duty status) with 390.6 suggests that carriers pressuring drivers to drive beyond limits also fail to document it properly. Use your RODS (record of duty status) accurately every day—this protects you legally.
  • Keep communication records with dispatch. Save all messages from dispatch or management directing you to perform unsafe operations. These become evidence if coercion is later investigated.
  • Know your rights under 49 USC § 31105. You are protected by federal law from retaliation for refusing unsafe operations or reporting safety violations. If you refuse an unsafe order and face discipline, that retaliation may itself trigger an FMCSA investigation.
  • Conduct vehicle inspections on Kaufman, Ford, and Freightliner equipment with extra care. Our citation data shows these makes appear most frequently in 390.6 cases, suggesting certain fleets or vehicle types may be subject to more intense coercion-related oversight. Document the condition of brakes, lights, and coupling devices thoroughly.

If you were cited at roadside, your carrier received a corrective action notice. Work with your safety manager to understand what prompted the inspection finding and ensure your fleet implements controls to prevent coercion allegations.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T15:23:57.613Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 390.6-COERCION Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 390.6-COERCION is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Missouri
7
OOS 0.0%
2. South Dakota
6
OOS 0.0%
3. California
6
OOS 0.0%
4. New Hampshire
3
OOS 0.0%
5. Pennsylvania
2
OOS 0.0%
6. Michigan
2
OOS 0.0%
7. Oregon
1
OOS 0.0%
8. South Carolina
1
OOS 0.0%
9. US
1
OOS 0.0%
10. Utah
1
OOS 0.0%
11. Arizona
1
OOS 0.0%
12. Wyoming
1
OOS 0.0%
13. Georgia
1
OOS 0.0%
14. Kentucky
1
OOS 0.0%
15. Massachusetts
1
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.