Prevention FAQ — FMCSR 397.67 (Hazmat Routing – Radioactive Materials)
Fleet safety guidance on radioactive materials routing compliance. Covers inspector focus areas, pre-trip protocols, documentation, root causes, and audit cadence based on 247 all-time citations.
- Code:
- 397.67
- Code System:
- FMCSR
- BASIC Category:
- Hazardous Materials
- OOS Eligible:
- Yes
- Severity Weight:
- 9
- Violation Group:
- BASIC 6
Ranks #1,170 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Violation Description
Failing to follow prescribed routing requirements for transport of radioactive materials.
Prevention FAQ for Fleet Managers
Pre-trip discipline, inspector focus, and root-cause fixes
› What specific routing violations do roadside inspectors focus on for radioactive materials transport?
Across our 13 million inspection records, radioactive materials routing citations have concentrated in Texas, where 64 citations were issued in the last 180 days. Inspectors primarily verify that drivers possess current routing authorization documents and that the selected route adheres to DOT-prescribed corridors for the specific isotope and package class. They cross-reference your manifest against approved state and federal hazmat routing maps. In Texas and similar high-enforcement states, inspectors are checking whether drivers deviated from approved routes to save time or fuel—a pattern we see paired with fatigue citations in 2 co-occurring inspections. Have your dispatch logs and GPS records ready to demonstrate compliance.
› What should be on the pre-trip inspection checklist for radioactive materials shipments?
Your pre-trip should include: (1) Verify the shipper's routing plan documentation is in the cab and matches the intended route; (2) Confirm the vehicle's hazmat placard, packaging, and labeling are correct and match the shipping papers; (3) Review the most recent DOT hazmat routing bulletin for any corridor closures or restrictions in your region; (4) Check that emergency response information (49 CFR 172.602) is current and accessible—we flagged this in 1 co-occurring inspection, suggesting access or maintenance gaps; (5) Document completion with date, driver name, and vehicle ID. This checklist should be retained for 12 months. Missing any step creates an OOS exposure and CSA severity weight of 9.
› What documentation must drivers carry and what must the fleet retain?
Drivers must carry: (1) Original or printed shipper's hazmat certification and routing authorization; (2) Bill of lading or shipping paper showing authorized route; (3) DOT Emergency Response information (49 CFR 172.602); (4) Current hazmat placard inventory log if applicable. Fleet must retain: (1) Copies of all routing authorizations for 12 months post-delivery; (2) Dispatch logs showing route assignment; (3) GPS or ELD records confirming adherence to prescribed route; (4) Pre-trip and post-trip inspection reports; (5) Driver training records on radioactive materials routing. Carriers in our top-cited group (UNITED PETROLEUM TRANSPORTS INC at 23 all-time citations) likely improved record-keeping discipline following citation.
› What root causes does the co-occurring violation data suggest?
Our inspection records show three patterns: First, 2 co-occurring citations with operator fatigue (code 392.2RG) indicate drivers skipping prescribed routes due to tiredness or schedule pressure—validate your delivery windows against realistic drive times. Second, brake defects (393.45DLPC and 393.45B2PC appear in 3 co-occurring inspections combined) suggest vehicle maintenance gaps; a poorly maintained hazmat tanker is more likely to be routed informally to avoid inspection. Third, emergency response information accessibility issues (172.602C1) co-occurred once, pointing to incomplete vehicle prep. Address these systematically: audit fatigue management, enforce mandatory equipment inspection before hazmat assignment, and require driver sign-off on emergency response placement.
› How should we verify repairs or vehicle readiness before assigning a vehicle to radioactive shipments?
Before any radioactive materials assignment: (1) Run a full vehicle inspection against your hazmat-specific checklist, not just routine maintenance; (2) Verify brake tubing, hoses, and all emergency systems are in compliance—brake defects co-occurred in 3 inspections over 90 days, a red flag for systemic maintenance issues; (3) Confirm all placards, labeling, and hazmat equipment are mounted correctly and visible; (4) Test emergency response information accessibility and legibility; (5) Generate a signed inspection report and attach it to the dispatch authorization; (6) If the vehicle is a HEIL, FRHT, or PTRB tanker (our top three cited makes at 73, 72, and 66 citations respectively), add a secondary brake and placard audit—these models appear disproportionately in our enforcement data. Do not dispatch on conditional or pending repairs.
› What should we review internally after a 397.67 citation?
Conduct a post-citation review within 48 hours: (1) Interview the driver on why the prescribed route was not followed—was it GPS error, dispatch miscommunication, traffic, or schedule pressure? (2) Pull the GPS/ELD log and compare actual route to the shipper's authorized route document; (3) Review dispatch instructions to the driver—was the route clearly marked or ambiguous? (4) Check the vehicle's pre-trip inspection report from that day; was brake, placard, or emergency equipment status noted? (5) Verify the driver's hazmat endorsement and any routing-specific training date; (6) Document the root cause and corrective action (retraining, dispatch process change, or vehicle reassignment). All-time, 247 citations with 0% OOS rate means inspectors are citing the violation but not grounding the vehicle—use that window to fix it before the next inspection.
› How does this violation affect our CSA Vehicle Maintenance BASIC or Safety Management profile?
FMCSR 397.67 carries a CSA severity weight of 9, the same as critical mechanical failures. While 397.67 is ranked #1162 of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume (relatively low frequency), each citation is weighted heavily in CSA Safety Management perception. Our peer-code data shows that similar hazmat routing violations (177.834A and 177.834 for loading/unloading) generate thousands of citations and trigger immediate OOS at 99.2% and 97.9% rates respectively. Although your 397.67 citations have a 0.0% OOS rate (compared to the all-FMCSR average of 31.4%), inspectors view routing non-compliance as indicating poor dispatch control and driver accountability. One citation can affect your score for 12 months; accumulating 2–3 in a year signals systemic risk to both FMCSA and insurance underwriters.
› What driver training topics should we prioritize to prevent 397.67 citations?
Focus training on: (1) Route Authorization Recognition: drivers must know how to read shipper routing documents and distinguish approved corridors from shortcuts; (2) GPS Limitations: teach drivers that GPS may not reflect DOT hazmat-specific routing rules and to verify with dispatch if the route seems off; (3) Fatigue and Decision-Making: connect routing compliance to the 2 co-occurring fatigue citations—tired drivers improvise routes; (4) Vehicle Equipment: drivers in HEIL, FRHT, and PTRB units (73, 72, 66 citations respectively) should receive make-specific pre-trip training, as these tankers dominate our enforcement data; (5) Emergency Response: ensure drivers can access and explain emergency response information to inspectors. Conduct this training annually for all hazmat endorsement holders and within 30 days of hire. Track completion rates and tie it to dispatch authorization.
› When should we consider filing a DataQs challenge on a 397.67 citation?
Consider a DataQs challenge if: (1) GPS and dispatch records conclusively show the vehicle followed the authorized route and the inspector noted an incorrect route based on visual assessment or incomplete manifest review; (2) the shipper's routing authorization is ambiguous or was updated after dispatch, and you have documentation of the timeline; (3) the citation references a route closure or corridor change that was not in effect at the time of transport—check DOT hazmat alert bulletins dated within 7 days of the citation; (4) the vehicle's placard and emergency response information were fully compliant, suggesting the citation was based on a misreading of the route documentation rather than a safety defect. Do not challenge based on argument alone; DataQs requires evidence. Your fleet should maintain legal counsel for hazmat citations given the CSA severity weight of 9.
› How often should we audit our radioactive materials routing compliance internally?
Conduct internal audits every 90 days. Our inspection data shows a cyclical pattern: June 2025 had a spike at 21 citations, followed by lower months (May, July at 8 citations each), then another spike in November at 27 citations. This suggests seasonal or regulatory review cycles. A quarterly audit cadence matches the data volatility and allows you to catch routing plan drift before inspectors do. In each 90-day audit: (1) pull 10–15 radioactive shipments at random; (2) compare GPS/ELD route logs to shipper authorization documents; (3) verify driver training currency; (4) check vehicle maintenance records for brake and placard compliance; (5) validate dispatch log accuracy. Over the last 12 months, 126 citations averaged 10.5 per month, so a single well-run quarterly audit captures roughly one month of industry enforcement activity, giving you early warning of emerging patterns in your fleet.
Top Enforcing States
Where 397.67 is most commonly cited (last 180 days)
Related Records
Data sources & freshness
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.
Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.
Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.