Prevention FAQ — FMCSR 397.13 (Smoking Near Hazmat)
Fleet guidance on preventing smoking violations near hazmat loads. Covers inspector focus areas, pre-trip procedures, documentation, root-cause analysis, and self-audit cadence based on 13M+ inspection records.
- Code:
- 397.13
- Code System:
- FMCSR
- BASIC Category:
- Hazardous Materials
- OOS Eligible:
- Yes
- Severity Weight:
- 8
- Violation Group:
- BASIC 6
Ranks #1,391 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Violation Description
Smoking or carrying a lighted cigarette, cigar, or pipe within 25 feet of a CMV containing certain hazardous materials.
Prevention FAQ for Fleet Managers
Pre-trip discipline, inspector focus, and root-cause fixes
› What exactly do roadside inspectors focus on when checking for 397.13 violations?
Inspectors verify that no one is smoking or carrying a lighted cigarette, cigar, or pipe within 25 feet of a CMV carrying placarded hazardous materials. In our inspection records, we see 397.13 cited most frequently in Texas (3 citations in the last 180 days), followed by Iowa and Illinois (2 citations each). The inspector's line of sight during a Level 1 or Level 2 inspection will sweep the driver's area, the cab exterior, and nearby personnel during loading/unloading. Look for ashtrays in the cab, ash residue, or any open smoking devices when the vehicle is stationary at a facility with hazmat. Enforcement is low-frequency but consistent—our records show 3 citations in the last 90 days across all carriers—so inspectors clearly note it when observed.
› What should our pre-trip and vehicle inspection checklist include to prevent this violation?
Add these items to your hazmat-route pre-trip inspection: (1) Remove and secure all ashtrays from the cab or clearly mark them as unusable. (2) Verify no smoking paraphernalia (lighters, open packs) are accessible in the cab. (3) Brief the driver on the 25-foot no-smoking perimeter before loading or unloading hazmat. (4) Check the vehicle placards are legible—this reinforces that hazmat is present and heightens driver awareness. (5) Log pre-trip sign-off by the driver confirming awareness of the no-smoking rule. Since our data shows smoking violations co-occur with vehicle maintenance issues (lighting, brake, windshield defects in the same inspections), use pre-trip as a moment to also verify basic equipment function, reducing the chance of a multi-violation stop.
› What documentation must drivers carry, and what should the fleet retain for hazmat smoking prevention?
Drivers must carry the Emergency Response Information (ERICA sheet or equivalent) for each hazmat shipment—our data shows this document's absence co-occurs with smoking violations in the same inspections. The fleet should retain: (1) Hazmat route authorization forms signed by the driver confirming he or she has received no-smoking instructions. (2) Pre-trip inspection logs signed by the driver and safety staff, documenting ashtray removal or disabling. (3) Incident reports from any previous citations or near-misses. (4) Training records showing date and content of smoking-policy refresher. Store these for at least 3 years. Drivers should keep a laminated card in the cab restating the rule. While only 116 all-time citations exist for this code, maintaining clean documentation protects your carrier in a DOT compliance audit.
› What are the common root causes of 397.13 violations, based on what else inspectors find?
Our co-occurrence data from the last 90 days reveals three patterns: (1) Emergency Response information gaps appear alongside smoking citations, suggesting drivers are rushing loads without full hazmat-compliance checks—add time in dispatch scheduling. (2) Vehicle defects (lighting, brakes, windshield) co-occur with smoking violations in the same inspection, indicating vehicles assigned to hazmat routes may not be receiving adequate maintenance—allocate pre-hazmat maintenance slots. (3) Driver fatigue (code 392.2RG) paired with smoking violations suggests tired drivers stop at facilities and light up during rest breaks, forgetting the 25-foot rule—emphasize fatigue management and facility-stop protocols in training. None of these violations resulted in out-of-service orders in our dataset, but fixing root causes prevents escalation to more serious hazmat violations like placarding errors (75.1% OOS rate on similar codes).
› How should we verify a vehicle is hazmat-ready before returning it to service after maintenance?
After any repair or ashtray removal, use this three-step verification: (1) Physical walk-around: Confirm the cab interior is clean, ashtrays are removed or locked, and no smoking paraphernalia is visible. (2) Driver sign-off: Have the assigned driver verbally confirm he or she understands the no-smoking rule and inspected the cab. (3) Maintenance tag and documentation: Log the date, repair/modification, and inspector initials on a tag affixed to the vehicle, retained in your fleet file. For hazmat carriers like Greenwood Motor Lines (6 all-time 397.13 citations in our data), this is especially critical—establish a pre-hazmat-route checklist that includes a final walk-through by a supervisor or safety officer. Given that vehicle makes like Freightliners (20 citations all-time) and Kenworths (9 citations) appear frequently in our dataset, ensure your maintenance procedure is standardized across all cab types.
› What should our post-citation review process look like if a driver receives a 397.13 violation?
After a citation, follow this five-step review: (1) Debrief the driver within 24 hours—ask where the smoking occurred (cab, outside the 25-foot zone, during a break), what triggered it (stress, fatigue, routine), and what he or she understood about the rule before. (2) Review the inspection report for any co-occurring codes that explain context (e.g., was the driver fatigued, was the vehicle in poor condition?). (3) Assess hazmat-specific training recency—if the driver hasn't completed a no-smoking module in the last 12 months, schedule it immediately. (4) Check vehicle maintenance records for any defects noted in the citation that might have distracted the driver. (5) Document and file the corrective action (retraining, ashtray removal confirmation, etc.) for your annual CSA review. Because our data shows 0% out-of-service rates on this code (compared to 31.4% average across all codes), the violation is not immediately severe—but documenting the response protects your carrier in a future audit.
› How does a 397.13 citation affect our carrier's CSA Vehicle Maintenance BASIC score?
A 397.13 citation carries a CSA Severity Weight of 8, placing it in the mid-range for enforcement impact. The violation is ranked #1378 of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation frequency, so it is statistically uncommon—your carrier is unlikely to accumulate enough of these to trigger a CSA investigation. However, when paired with the vehicle-maintenance co-occurring codes we observed (brake, lighting, windshield defects), inspectors may view the violations as part of a broader neglect pattern. The 0.0% out-of-service rate for 397.13 means inspectors do not deem it immediately unsafe enough to ground the vehicle, but repeated violations could signal poor driver training or vehicle standards to a CSA auditor. Monitor your 397.13 frequency relative to the 18 citations in the last 12 months we see across the industry—if your carrier exceeds one per 500 vehicles annually, intensify your hazmat-route driver vetting and pre-trip protocols.
› What training topics should we emphasize to close the gap on smoking-related violations?
Design a targeted training module covering: (1) The 25-foot rule mechanics—draw a diagram showing the perimeter measured from the vehicle edge; explain that the rule applies even if the load is not actively being transferred. (2) High-risk moments—waiting at loading docks, rest breaks at truck stops, pre-trip inspections, and nighttime operations (when smoking is most tempting and hardest to observe). (3) Enforcement context—inform drivers that this violation, though infrequent, is always intentional and carries a CSA weight, signaling poor judgment to future inspectors. (4) Vehicle-specific protocols—for drivers assigned to hazmat routes in Freightliners (20 all-time citations), Kenworths (9 citations), or other top makes in our data, ensure they know how to disable or remove the ashtray in their assigned unit. (5) Role-plays—have drivers practice declining a cigarette from a dock worker and explaining the rule. Deliver this training at hire, annually, and after any citation, with sign-off documentation.
› When should we consider filing a DataQs challenge if a driver disputes a 397.13 citation?
File a DataQs challenge if: (1) The driver credibly states smoking did not occur—for example, if the inspector reported the violation at a location where no hazmat was being transferred (off-route), challenge the violation's validity. (2) The vehicle was not carrying placarded hazmat at the time of the stop—request proof from the citation that hazmat was on board or being loaded. (3) The smoking occurred more than 25 feet from the vehicle, outside the perimeter. (4) The inspector did not witness the violation personally—if the citation is based on assumption or ash residue alone, you have grounds to challenge. Document the driver's statement, review the inspection narrative in detail, and gather GPS or dock records to show timing. Because only 116 all-time citations exist for this code and 0 have resulted in out-of-service orders, your carrier has a strong track record—the citation stands out. If the driver has a clean record and the violation appears marginal, DataQs review is justified.
› How often should we self-audit hazmat vehicles and drivers for smoking compliance?
Establish a quarterly self-audit cadence, justified by our inspection trend data. In the last 90 days, we recorded 3 citations nationally; in the last 12 months, 18 citations. This steady, low-frequency pattern suggests smoking near hazmat is not a widespread epidemic, but it remains a persistent blind spot. Quarterly audits allow you to: (1) Re-inspect ashtrays and cab interiors on all hazmat-assigned vehicles. (2) Conduct brief compliance interviews with drivers who frequently run hazmat routes. (3) Review dispatch records to ensure hazmat routes are assigned only to trained, vetted drivers. (4) Cross-check against your maintenance and pre-trip logs to identify trends (e.g., do certain locations or times of day correlate with violations?). If your fleet has 20+ hazmat vehicles, increase audits to monthly; if under 5, quarterly is sufficient. Document each audit and share results with your safety team to close any gaps before an inspector arrives.
Top Enforcing States
Where 397.13 is most commonly cited (last 180 days)
Often Cited Together
Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)
Related Records
Data sources & freshness
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.
Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.
Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.