Ranks #324 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.2% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Violation Description
Exhaust - System discharging from a truck or truck-tractor at a location other than at the rear of the cab
Questions & Answers
Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data
Will 393.83E put my truck out of service?
Almost certainly not. 393.83E carries an all-time out-of-service rate of just 0.2% — only 12 trucks placed OOS out of 5,247 total citations in our inspection records. The code is not OOS-eligible under FMCSA policy, which explains why 5,235 of those inspections ended with a citation but the driver kept rolling. For comparison, the all-FMCSR average OOS rate sits at 31.4%, so 393.83E is far below the norm. You'll receive the violation on your inspection report, but the inspector should not be ordering you to park the truck solely for this defect.
How many CSA points does a 393.83E violation add to my record?
The STATISTICS block for 393.83E does not include a severity weight value, so a specific point total cannot be stated here. What the data does show is that 393.83E falls under the Vehicle Maintenance BASIC in CSA. Citations from roadside inspections carry a time-weight multiplier — violations from the most recent 6 months count at full value, those 6–12 months old count at two-thirds, and those 12–24 months old count at one-third. Because our records show 3,532 citations in just the last 12 months, inspectors are actively writing this up, meaning any citation will sit at full weight for at least half a year.
I just got cited for 393.83E — what should I do right now?
Take these steps immediately:
Document the exhaust routing — photograph the discharge point before any repair so you have evidence of the pre-repair condition.
Check for co-occurring issues. Our inspection records show that in the last 90 days, 393.83E inspections also flagged fuel system leaks (396.5B-L, 196 shared inspections), power steering leaks (110 shared inspections), and coupling device defects (107 shared inspections). A full pre-trip once the exhaust is routed correctly can catch these before your next stop.
Get the exhaust rerouted to discharge at the rear of the cab — that is the specific routing requirement under 393.83E.
Retain your repair invoice in case you file a DataQs challenge or face a compliance review.
Is 393.83E a serious violation compared to other Vehicle Maintenance codes?
It's relatively minor by the numbers. At a 0.2% OOS rate, 393.83E sits well below nearly every peer code in the Vehicle Maintenance category. For context, our inspection records show that 396.3(a)(1) — general inspection/repair/maintenance — carries a 45.3% OOS rate across 236,919 citations, and even 393.9(a) for inoperable required lamps hits 15.4% across 660,737 citations. 393.83E is ranked #331 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume, so it's actively enforced, but the low OOS rate signals inspectors treat it as a documentation and routing defect rather than an immediate safety emergency.
Can I fight a 393.83E citation through DataQs?
Yes, you can submit a DataQs Request for Data Review (RDR) through the FMCSA DataQs system for any roadside inspection finding. Because 393.83E is an equipment/routing violation — not a documentation-based citation — a successful challenge typically requires evidence that the exhaust system was actually discharging at the correct location at the time of inspection. Useful evidence includes timestamped photographs, repair records predating the inspection, or a signed statement from a certified mechanic. Our records show 5,247 all-time citations for this code, so FMCSA reviewers are familiar with it. Submit your RDR promptly; the process has defined response windows and older inspections can be harder to dispute.
What states write the most 393.83E tickets?
Arizona, California, and Texas lead the count over the last 180 days. Our inspection records show 64 citations in AZ, 63 in CA, and 59 in TX during that window. Texas also stands out for enforcement severity — it produced 2 OOS placements in that period, giving it a 3.4% OOS rate for this code, the highest of any top state. California logged 1 OOS for a 1.6% rate. If your lanes run through any of these three states, inspectors there are clearly familiar with the 393.83E routing requirement and will check for it.
How urgent is it to fix a 393.83E exhaust issue after being cited?
Fix it before your next inspection. While the all-time OOS rate is only 0.2%, the volume trend shows this code is being cited at an accelerating pace — 629 citations in the last 90 days alone, part of a 12-month total of 3,532 citations. Monthly counts peaked at 396 in October 2025 and have remained above 230 every month in the recorded period. A second citation in a short window compounds your CSA score in the Vehicle Maintenance BASIC, and the co-occurring violations in our records — fuel leaks, brake issues, steering leaks — suggest inspectors who find an exhaust routing problem often dig deeper. Repair it and document it.
Does a 393.83E violation follow the driver, the carrier, or both?
Both, under FMCSA's CSA methodology. Equipment violations like 393.83E are attributed to the carrier's Vehicle Maintenance BASIC, since the carrier is responsible for maintaining the exhaust system. However, if the cited driver operates under their own USDOT number or is an owner-operator, the violation hits their record directly. Our records show the top-cited carriers are predominantly cross-border Mexican carriers — for example, TRANSPORTES DE CARGA FEMA SA DE CV (USDOT 1175018) leads with 43 all-time citations — suggesting fleet-level maintenance patterns drive repeat exposure. Drivers employed by a carrier won't carry this violation to a new employer's CSA score, but owner-operators will.
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the
Source registry
for dataset-level coverage and the
Freshness log
for last-import timestamps.
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
Refreshed weekly.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada.
Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.