393.65F-F Tire Citation: What Happens Now

You were cited for operating with a flat or leaking tire. Here's what the data shows about enforcement, your risk of being sidelined, and how to prevent it.

Severity Weight
1
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.65F-F
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
1
Violation Group:
Fuel Systems

Ranks #665 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.5% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Fuel - Improper fuel line protection.

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 393.65F-F means in plain language

This citation means an inspector found your truck operating with a tire that is flat or has an audible air leak. "Audible" is the key word—the inspector heard the air escaping, or the tire was visibly deflated below safe operating pressure.

A flat tire creates two problems: it reduces your vehicle's braking stability and load capacity, and it can overheat and fail suddenly. An actively leaking tire tells inspectors your pre-trip inspection either didn't happen or wasn't thorough enough. This code doesn't trigger an immediate out-of-service order in most cases, but it's a violation that shows a maintenance gap.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across our 13 million inspection records, we've documented 1,234 all-time citations for 393.65F-F. In the last 12 months alone, inspectors issued 665 citations for this violation, and in the past 90 days, 106 citations were recorded. This ranks the code at #667 out of 3,036 FMCSR violations by citation volume—a mid-range enforcement issue, but not rare.

The most important number for your situation: the out-of-service rate for 393.65F-F is 0.5%. That means only 6 vehicles out of 1,228 cited were placed out of service. By contrast, the all-FMCSR average out-of-service rate sits at 31.4%. In plain terms, inspectors rarely sideline trucks for a flat or leaking tire alone—they issue a citation and expect you to fix it before continuing. You're likely to be allowed to drive to a repair facility or staging area.

However, monthly data over the last 12 months shows enforcement is steady and cyclical. May 2025 saw 85 citations, while April 2026 has already logged 3. This suggests tire defects are a consistent inspection focus, particularly in spring and early summer months.

Who gets cited most

Our inspection records show citations for 393.65F-F are concentrated in three states over the last 180 days: the US unspecified category with 183 citations, California with 31 citations, and Missouri with 13 citations. The variation in out-of-service rates is minimal across these regions—California's 3.2% OOS rate is slightly higher than the national 0.0% rate for the other top jurisdictions, but the difference is not dramatic. This tells you that the violation itself is handled consistently nationwide, and repair expectations are uniform.

Among carriers in our database, fleets such as Servicios Rapidos Trebol SA de CV (USDOT 825535) with 56 citations and Jesus Pedro Perez Carrillo (USDOT 1159851) with 26 citations appear most frequently. This pattern does not indicate negligence on the part of these carriers—it reflects higher exposure (more inspections, more miles) and may point to fleet composition or operational geography.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

393.65F-F sits in the Vehicle Maintenance category alongside tire, brake, lighting, and steering codes. To put its severity in context, consider three peer violations:

393.9(a) — Inoperable required lamps has accumulated 660,737 citations with a 15.4% out-of-service rate. Lamps are cited far more often, and inspectors place trucks out of service for lamp defects roughly 30 times more frequently than for leaking tires.

393.11 — Lighting devices/reflectors shows 179,734 citations with a 1.8% OOS rate, still higher than 393.65F-F's 0.5%.

393.78 — Windshield condition defective has 157,894 citations with a 0.3% OOS rate—the closest peer in terms of enforcement leniency. Both are visibility and safety-adjacent but rarely justify sidelining a vehicle on their own.

The data indicates inspectors treat 393.65F-F as correctable without immediate service interruption, much like windshield defects.

How to avoid it

The most reliable defense is a rigorous pre-trip tire inspection. Our data on co-occurring violations reveals patterns that show what inspectors are checking:

  • Check tire pressure and condition every morning. Press on each tire sidewall and tread. If you feel softness or hear any hiss, do not operate the vehicle. The data shows 393.65F-F often appears alongside 393.67C4-F (other tire defects), meaning inspectors are thorough on tire walkarounds.

  • Listen for air leaks during your walk-around. If a leak is audible to you, it will be audible to an inspector. Even a slow leak can worsen over an 8-hour shift. Replace or repair the tire before dispatch.

  • Verify your vehicle's tire maintenance schedule is being followed. Our records show Freightliner (258 citations), Kenworth (178), and utility trailers (171 and 105 respectively) appear most often in 393.65F-F citations. These are not defective models—they are high-volume platforms. Ensure your fleet's tire rotation, replacement, and pressure monitoring are documented and current.

  • Pay attention to co-occurring violations. When 393.65F-F appears in an inspection, it frequently co-occurs with 391.11B2-Z (driver language requirements, 41 shared inspections) and 393.95F (warning devices, 15 shared inspections). This suggests inspectors conducting thorough multi-system walkarounds. A complete pre-trip catches more defects before inspection.

  • Don't delay repairs for minor leaks. A tire with an audible leak today becomes a blowout tomorrow. Our data shows this violation clusters in certain months; early in your week or shift is the safest time to address it.

The bottom line: 393.65F-F is a correctable maintenance gap with a low risk of out-of-service placement. A diligent pre-trip inspection catches it before an inspector does, and a prompt repair keeps you legal and safe.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T14:07:14.181Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 393.65F-F Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 393.65F-F is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. US
112
OOS 0.0%
2. California
33
OOS 0.0%
3. Maine
13
OOS 0.0%
4. Missouri
9
OOS 0.0%
5. Idaho
3
OOS 0.0%
6. Georgia
2
OOS 0.0%
7. Montana
1
OOS 0.0%
8. New Jersey
1
OOS 0.0%
9. Nevada
1
OOS 0.0%
10. Pennsylvania
1
OOS 0.0%
11. Washington
1
OOS 0.0%
12. Arkansas
1
OOS 0.0%
13. Wisconsin
1
OOS 0.0%
14. Arizona
1
OOS 0.0%
15. Colorado
1
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.