Everything drivers and fleet managers need to know about 393.55D2 citations: OOS risk, CSA points, top states, and what to do after a roadside inspection.
Ranks #454 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.1% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Violation Description
CMV manufactured on/after 3/1/2001 not equipped with ABS malfunction circuit / lamp from towed vehicle in cab.
Questions & Answers
Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data
Will 393.55D2 put my truck out of service?
Almost certainly not. Across all-time inspection records, 393.55D2 carries a 0.1% out-of-service rate — only 4 trucks placed OOS out of 2,884 total citations. Compare that to the all-FMCSR average OOS rate of 31.4%, and this code sits dramatically below the norm. That said, "almost never" is not "never." Inspectors retain discretion, and if your coupling device is genuinely failing, a defect severe enough to create an imminent hazard can still result in an OOS order on the spot. Fix any hardware issues before the next roll.
How many CSA points does a 393.55D2 violation add to my record?
A 393.55D2 citation carries a CSA severity weight of 8 out of a maximum of 10. That places it near the top of the severity scale. The actual points applied to your BASIC score are multiplied based on how recently the inspection occurred — violations in the last 6 months carry a time-weight multiplier of 3x, violations between 6 and 12 months ago carry 2x, and violations older than 12 months carry 1x. So an 8-severity citation from last month effectively hits your Vehicle Maintenance BASIC with 24 weighted points. Older citations fade, but new ones hit hard.
I just got cited for 393.55D2 — what should I do right now?
Take these steps immediately:
Inspect the coupling hardware now. Don't wait for the next pre-trip. In our inspection records, 393.55D2 appears in the same inspection as 393.55E (100 shared inspections in 90 days), meaning defects in related coupling components often travel together.
Check your lamps. Code 393.9 co-occurred in 143 inspections alongside 393.55D2 in the last 90 days — the most common pairing. A lamp failure may have triggered the stop.
Document repairs with dated receipts. This protects you in any DataQs challenge.
Notify your safety manager so the citation is logged before it surfaces in the SMS snapshot.
Is 393.55D2 a serious violation compared to other vehicle maintenance codes?
The 0.1% OOS rate on 393.55D2 makes it far less operationally dangerous than most peers in the Vehicle Maintenance category. For context, our inspection records show that 396.3(a)(1) — general inspection/repair/maintenance — carries a 45.3% OOS rate across 236,919 citations, and even 393.9(a) (inoperable required lamps) hits 15.4% OOS across 660,737 citations. The 393.55D2 OOS rate of 0.1% is about 314 times lower than the all-FMCSR average of 31.4%. The severity weight of 8, however, means the CSA score impact is real even if the immediate enforcement consequence is usually just a citation.
Can I fight a 393.55D2 citation through DataQs?
Yes, you can submit a Request for Data Review (RDR) through FMCSA's DataQs system to challenge a 393.55D2 citation. Because this is an equipment-condition finding rather than a documentation violation, your strongest grounds are evidence that the coupling device was inspected and found compliant — dated repair records, pre-trip inspection logs, or a post-inspection shop report showing no defect. If the inspector misidentified the component or applied the wrong code, that is also a valid basis for dispute. Accepted DataQs challenges result in the violation being amended or removed from your SMS record. The process typically takes 30–60 days.
What states write the most 393.55D2 tickets?
Texas dominates by a wide margin. In the last 180 days, our inspection records show Texas issued 712 citations under 393.55D2 — more than ten times the next closest state. Illinois came in second with 66 citations, followed closely by Iowa with 63. New Mexico recorded 2 citations and North Carolina recorded 1 over the same period. If you run lanes through Texas, your exposure to this citation is substantially higher than anywhere else in the country. Texas also recorded the only OOS event in that window, accounting for the 0.1% OOS rate seen there.
How urgent is it to fix a 393.55D2 defect — is enforcement increasing?
The trend warrants attention. Over the last 12 months our inspection records show 1,856 citations for 393.55D2, and monthly volume has been climbing. Citations went from 58 in April 2025 to a peak of 197 in October 2025, and stayed above 130 through early 2026. The 90-day count of 385 citations confirms this is an actively enforced code right now, not a dormant one. The OOS risk stays low at 0.1%, but with a CSA severity weight of 8, each citation is a meaningful hit. Fleets running high-volume Texas corridors in particular should treat coupling inspections as a pre-trip priority, not an afterthought.
Does a 393.55D2 violation follow the driver, the carrier, or both?
Both. Under FMCSA's CSA methodology, equipment violations like 393.55D2 are recorded against the carrier's USDOT number in the Vehicle Maintenance BASIC, affecting the carrier's SMS percentile ranking. At the same time, the citation is tied to the driver's inspection history and can surface when a prospective carrier pulls your Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) report. Our inspection records show the top cited carrier accumulated 8 citations under this code (NATIONAL DRAYAGE SERVICES DE LLC, USDOT 1747093), illustrating how repeated citations concentrate against a carrier's profile. Drivers should keep personal copies of all inspection reports regardless of who operates the equipment.
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the
Source registry
for dataset-level coverage and the
Freshness log
for last-import timestamps.
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
Refreshed weekly.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada.
Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.