FMCSR 393.55C2: Coupling Device Defective — Driver Q&A

Everything drivers and fleet managers need to know about 393.55C2 citations: OOS risk, CSA points, top states, and what to do next.

Severity Weight
4
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.55C2
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
4
Violation Group:
Brakes All Others

Ranks #289 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

CMV other than truck-tractor manufactured on or after March 1, 1998 not equipped with an antilock brake system.

Questions & Answers

Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data

Will 393.55C2 put my truck out of service?

Almost certainly not. Across all-time inspection records, 393.55C2 carries a 0.0% out-of-service rate — only 1 vehicle was placed OOS out of 6,834 citations total. For context, the all-FMCSR average OOS rate is 31.4%, meaning this code sits dramatically below the norm. The citation goes on your record and counts toward CSA, but inspectors are not routinely parking trucks for this finding alone. That said, "not OOS" does not mean "not serious" — see the CSA points question below.

How many CSA points does a 393.55C2 violation add?

393.55C2 carries a severity weight of 8, which is near the top of the FMCSA scoring scale. The actual points applied to your CSA record are multiplied based on how recently the violation occurred: inspections in the last 6 months receive a 3× time-weight multiplier, 6–12 months get 2×, and beyond 12 months the base weight applies. At 8 severity × 3 time multiplier, a fresh 393.55C2 citation contributes 24 weighted points to your Vehicle Maintenance BASIC — enough to push a fleet toward the intervention threshold on its own if violations accumulate.

I just got cited for 393.55C2 — what should I do right now?

Take these steps immediately:

  1. Document the coupling device condition with photos before any repair — you'll need this if you file a DataQs challenge.
  2. Get the defect repaired and documented by a qualified mechanic as soon as possible, even though OOS is rare for this code.
  3. Audit related systems. Our inspection records show that in the last 90 days, 393.55C2 appeared on the same inspection as 393.9 (inoperable lamps, 358 shared inspections), 393.45B2UV (brake tubing, 163 shared inspections), and 396.17C (no proof of periodic inspection, 147 shared inspections). Those co-occurring issues are worth checking proactively.
  4. Notify your fleet safety manager — the 8-point severity weight means this needs to go into your maintenance log, not just a repair slip.

How serious is 393.55C2 compared to other maintenance violations?

Serious on CSA points, low on roadside shutdown risk. The 393.55C2 OOS rate of 0.0% compares favorably to peer Vehicle Maintenance codes like 396.3(a)(1) — general inspection and maintenance — which carries a 45.3% OOS rate across 236,919 citations, and 393.9(a) inoperable required lamps at a 15.4% OOS rate across 660,737 citations. However, 393.55C2's severity weight of 8 means it punches hard in CSA scoring even when it doesn't trigger a shutdown. In citation volume, this code ranks #287 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes, so inspectors do write it regularly.

Can I fight a 393.55C2 citation through DataQs?

Yes, you can submit a Request for Data Review (RDR) through FMCSA's DataQs system. Because 393.55C2 is an equipment condition finding rather than a documentation violation, a successful challenge typically requires evidence that the coupling device was not actually defective at the time of inspection — photos taken at the scene, a mechanic's written assessment, or pre-trip inspection records showing the component passed. Equipment-based findings can be harder to overturn than paperwork errors, but they are not unchallengeable. File within the recommended window and attach all physical evidence. If the RDR is upheld, the violation is masked from your CSA score.

Where in the country is 393.55C2 cited the most?

Texas dominates enforcement of this code by a wide margin. In the last 180 days, our inspection records show Texas logged 1,951 citations for 393.55C2 with a 0.0% OOS rate. Illinois was a distant second at 102 citations, followed by Iowa at 63 citations and New Mexico at 3 citations. If your routes run through Texas — particularly cross-border or intrastate operations — coupling device condition is clearly a priority inspection item for officers in that state.

Is 393.55C2 getting cited more often — should my fleet worry about the trend?

Yes, citation volume has climbed sharply over the past year. Our database shows 924 citations in just the last 90 days and 4,346 in the last 12 months, compared to 6,834 all-time — meaning roughly 64% of all recorded citations have occurred in the past year alone. Monthly data confirms the surge: citations jumped from 123 in April 2025 to a peak of 426 in August 2025, and have held above 380 most months since. With an 8-point severity weight, a fleet accumulating multiple citations at this pace will see meaningful CSA BASIC score movement. Pre-trip coupling inspections and documented maintenance records are the practical mitigation.

Does a 393.55C2 citation follow the driver or the carrier on CSA?

Both, but in different BASIC categories. Under FMCSA's CSA methodology, equipment violations like 393.55C2 are recorded on the carrier's Vehicle Maintenance BASIC, which is tied to the carrier's DOT number. The driver's PSP (Pre-Employment Screening Program) record also captures the citation, since the inspection is linked to the driver present at the time. This means a cited driver carries the mark on their PSP history regardless of which carrier they work for next, while the carrier absorbs the Vehicle Maintenance BASIC impact. Carriers with multiple 393.55C2 citations — our records show TEXAS INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES INC with 33 all-time and WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS INC with 31 — illustrate how quickly this can concentrate on a single DOT number.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T12:58:44.695Z Answers reference TruckCodex inspection data Read the full article → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 393.55C2 is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Texas
1,184
OOS 0.0%
2. Illinois
128
OOS 0.0%
3. Iowa
49
OOS 0.0%
4. New Mexico
2
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.