393.13D1 Citation: Reflective Sheeting Placement Rules

You got cited for improper side placement of retroreflective material on an older truck. Here's what the violation means, how enforcement works, and what happens next.

Severity Weight
3
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.13D1
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
3
Violation Group:
Reflective Sheeting

Ranks #1,365 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Improper Side Placement of retroreflective sheeting or reflex reflective material as required for vehicles manufactured before December 1993

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 393.13D1 means in plain language

This violation applies to commercial trucks manufactured before December 1, 1993. Your truck is required to have retroreflective sheeting or reflex reflective material—highly visible striping designed to reflect light back at oncoming drivers—placed on the sides of your vehicle in specific locations.

When an inspector cites you for 393.13D1, they're saying the reflective material on your truck's sides isn't positioned where the regulation requires it to be. This isn't about whether the material is faded, cracked, or missing entirely—those are separate violations. This code specifically targets incorrect placement: the stripes are there, but they're in the wrong spot along the side of your vehicle.

Retroreflective sheeting is critical for nighttime visibility. Other drivers need to see the outline of your truck clearly in their headlights. Improper placement defeats that purpose because the material isn't doing the job it's supposed to do from the angles where it matters most.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across our 13 million+ inspection records, 393.13D1 citations are relatively uncommon. Our database shows 128 all-time citations for this violation, with 81 issued in the last 12 months and 22 in the last 90 days. This ranks 393.13D1 at #1356 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume—you're dealing with an infrequently cited violation.

Here's what matters most for your situation: the OOS (out-of-service) rate is 0.0%. In all 128 citations we've tracked, inspectors have never placed a vehicle out of service for this violation alone. By contrast, the all-FMCSR average OOS rate is 31.4%, so 393.13D1 citations carry far lower enforcement severity than most vehicle maintenance violations.

The citation trend shows seasonal variation. In our records over the last 12 months, citations peaked in July 2025 with 12 cases, dipped to 2 in October 2025, spiked again to 12 in February 2026, and settled back to 8 in March 2026. This pattern suggests enforcement activity clusters around specific inspection campaigns or regions rather than being consistently distributed.

Who gets cited most

Our inspection data from the last 180 days shows that Texas dominates enforcement for this code: 29 citations with a 0.0% OOS rate. This accounts for the vast majority of recent enforcement activity we track.

No single carrier shows a dominant pattern in our all-time records. The top 10 carriers each have exactly 2 citations for this violation, meaning enforcement is widely dispersed across the industry rather than concentrated on any particular fleet. Carriers in our data such as Adrian Ives Portales Aguilar (USDOT 2456389), Transportes 100 Silva SA de CV (USDOT 2937853), and Tire Trax Inc (USDOT 2104845) each appear with 2 citations, but this reflects normal citation distribution rather than any pattern of compliance issues.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

To put 393.13D1 in perspective, consider these other vehicle maintenance violations:

393.9 (Inoperable Required Lamp) has been cited 180,097 times in our database with a 6.9% OOS rate. That's roughly 1,400 times more frequent than 393.13D1 and carries real out-of-service risk.

393.11 (Lighting Devices/Reflectors) has 179,734 all-time citations with a 1.8% OOS rate. Even though reflective material is the subject of both codes, 393.11 is cited far more often and does result in occasional OOS placements.

393.78 (Windshield Condition Defective) sits at 157,894 citations with only a 0.3% OOS rate—very similar to 393.13D1 in that it almost never triggers OOS, but cited substantially more often overall.

Your citation is in the lower-severity tier of DOT violations. It's not a slam-dunk compliance failure, and your truck won't be pulled off the road because of it.

How to avoid it

The key to avoiding 393.13D1 citations is understanding where the reflective material must sit on your truck's sides and checking it during every pre-trip inspection:

  • Know the placement rules for your truck's manufacture year. Vehicles built before December 1, 1993, have specific requirements for where side retroreflective material must be mounted. If you're uncertain about your truck's build date or the exact placement zone, consult the manufacturer's documentation or your carrier's maintenance manual before the next inspection.

  • Inspect side striping during pre-trip walkarounds. Walk the entire length of both sides of your trailer and tractor. Look at the retroreflective sheeting or striping. Make sure it's positioned where it should be—not too high, not too low, and consistent along the side of the vehicle.

  • Report placement issues to your carrier or maintenance team immediately. If you notice during a pre-trip that the reflective material has shifted, sagged, or become misaligned, don't drive it. Get it corrected by maintenance. Our data shows that reflective material violations often co-occur with other lighting problems: 393.9 (Inoperable Required Lamp) appeared in 13 shared inspections in the last 90 days, and 393.11 (Lighting devices/reflectors) in 7. This suggests that vehicles with reflective placement problems may have broader lighting system issues.

  • Schedule proactive maintenance if your truck is near the threshold age. If your vehicle is from the early 1990s, the adhesive on retroreflective sheeting can degrade, causing material to shift or peel. Our top cited vehicle makes include Freightliner (36 citations), Peterbilt (25), and Kenworth (20). If you're driving one of those models from that era, factor reflective material inspection and replacement into your maintenance schedule.

  • Cross-check brake and suspension systems during the same inspection cycle. Our records show that 393.13D1 co-occurs with brake and suspension codes: 393.47E (Slack adjuster defective), 393.48A (Inoperative/defective brakes), and 393.207A (Suspension defective) each appeared in 4-5 shared inspections in the last 90 days. These violations suggest comprehensive vehicle age-related deterioration. If you're getting cited for reflective material placement on an older truck, have your entire maintenance system reviewed, not just the reflective sheeting.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T15:21:29.496Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 393.13D1 Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 393.13D1 is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Texas
28
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.