393.110B2II-C: Cargo Securement for Logs Explained

You were cited for unsecured logs. Learn what this violation means, why 99.5% of these citations result in out-of-service, and how to prevent it.

OOS Eligible
Severity Weight
3
OOS Eligible
Yes
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.110B2II-C
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
Yes
Severity Weight:
3
Violation Group:
Tiedown

Ranks #585 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 99.5% is above the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Cargo - Insufficient tiedowns (w/o headerboard/blocking) for article(s) of cargo longer than 5 feet and no more than 10 feet.

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 393.110B2II-C means in plain language

This citation means an inspector found that logs in your cargo were not secured according to federal requirements. Logs are heavy, dense cargo that shift easily during braking, turns, and acceleration—and when they shift, they can damage your truck, injure someone, or spill into traffic.

The regulation requires logs to be fastened down with tiedowns, restraints, or other securement devices that meet specific standards for working load limits and spacing. If an inspector pulled open your trailer and found logs that could move freely, weren't held in place by proper equipment, or had damaged restraints, you'll be cited under this code.

This is different from a generic cargo securement problem. This code specifically flags logs—one of the highest-risk load types on the road.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Our inspection records show this is one of the strictest enforcement codes in the federal motor carrier system. Across 13 million inspections in our database, we see a 99.5% out-of-service rate for 393.110B2II-C—meaning inspectors placed the vehicle out of service in 1,504 out of 1,511 all-time citations. The all-FMCSR average OOS rate is just 31.4%, so this code is enforced at roughly 3.2 times the typical rate.

In the last 90 days alone, we recorded 204 citations. Over the last 12 months, that total is 938 citations. The monthly trend shows steady enforcement: May through March averaged around 80–95 citations per month, with a sharp drop in April (only 7 citations, likely due to the snapshot date of April 20).

Nationally, 393.110B2II-C ranks 602nd out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume. That's middle-of-the-pack frequency, but the out-of-service rate is extreme. Once cited, you're almost certain to be pulled from service.

Who gets cited most

Our data shows the top three states for this violation over the last 180 days are California (81 citations), New York (35 citations), and Washington (29 citations).

In California, the OOS rate is 98.8%—slightly lower than the national 99.5%, but still near-universal. New York and Washington both sit at a perfect 100% OOS rate, meaning every single citation in those states resulted in an out-of-service order.

Across all top-cited states—including Pennsylvania, Maryland, Tennessee, Indiana, Missouri, New Jersey, and Florida—OOS rates cluster at 99–100%. There's virtually no variation; if you're cited for this code anywhere, you're going down.

Fleets such as Western Express Inc have received 16 citations for this violation historically, and Patrick Industries has received 9 citations. This isn't an indictment of those carriers, but rather a reflection of the scale of their operations and log-hauling exposure.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

Within the vehicle maintenance category, 393.110B2II-C sits in extreme territory. Compare it to peer codes:

  • 393.9(a) — Inoperable required lamps: 660,737 citations but only a 15.4% OOS rate. You're 90 times more likely to be cited for broken lamps, but far less likely to be placed out of service.
  • 396.3(a)(1) — Inspection/repair/maintenance (general): 236,919 citations with a 45.3% OOS rate. More than 150 times more common than 393.110B2II-C, but less than half as likely to result in OOS.
  • 396.17C-PI — No proof of periodic inspection: 212,081 citations but 0.0% OOS rate. You might be cited, but almost never taken out of service.

This code is a low-volume, high-consequence violation. Inspectors treat log-securement failures as genuine safety threats, not paperwork problems.

How to avoid it

Derived from our co-occurring violations and cited vehicle makes, here's how to stay compliant:

  • Walk your entire load before departure. Manually tug every tiedown, ratchet strap, and chain securing the logs. Our data shows 27 co-occurring citations for damaged tiedowns (393.104B-C) in the last 90 days—meaning poor pre-trip inspection leads to compound violations. Don't assume equipment from your last run is still sound.

  • Replace damaged or worn restraints immediately. If a strap is frayed, a ratchet won't engage fully, or a chain has rust or bent links, replace it before you load. A damaged tiedown will fail under road stress, and inspectors test for this at roadside.

  • Space tiedowns correctly along the load. Don't cluster all restraints at the front or back. Federal rules specify spacing and working load limits. If you're unfamiliar with the exact requirements, ask your dispatcher or fleet safety manager for a diagram before you haul logs.

  • Check that every tiedown is rated for your load weight. Logs are dense and heavy. A tiedown rated for 5,000 lbs working load isn't adequate if your load section weighs 7,000 lbs. Verify load weight and tiedown capacity before securing.

  • Secure the entire length of the load. Logs must be restrained at regular intervals, not just at the ends. Inspectors will check the middle third of your trailer as carefully as the front.

  • Document your securement. Take photos of your tiedowns before leaving the yard. If you're cited and the restraints appear undamaged in the photo, you have evidence the load was properly secured at departure—useful if shifting occurred en route.

Our inspection data shows that drivers hauling Freightliner (197 citations), Ford (184 citations), and Peterbilt (111 citations) trucks are most frequently cited for this violation. This likely reflects those models' popularity in hauling work, not inherent deficiency—but if you operate one of these platforms, maintain extra diligence on cargo restraint systems and tiedown attachment points specific to your truck.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T14:00:13.182Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 393.110B2II-C Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 393.110B2II-C is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. California
83
OOS 98.8%
2. Pennsylvania
35
OOS 97.1%
3. Tennessee
22
OOS 100.0%
4. Maryland
21
OOS 100.0%
5. Missouri
18
OOS 100.0%
6. Washington
17
OOS 100.0%
7. New Jersey
17
OOS 100.0%
8. New York
15
OOS 100.0%
9. Florida
15
OOS 100.0%
10. South Carolina
15
OOS 100.0%
11. Alabama
14
OOS 100.0%
12. Arizona
12
OOS 100.0%
13. Colorado
10
OOS 100.0%
14. Kansas
9
OOS 100.0%
15. Oregon
9
OOS 100.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.