FMCSR 393.106(a) — Cargo Securement Front End: Q&A

Will 393.106(a) put your truck out of service? What CSA points does it add? Get direct answers grounded in 13M+ inspection records.

Severity Weight
1
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.106(a)
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
1
Violation Group:
Securement Device

Ranks #1,797 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 27.3% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

No/improper front end structure/headerboard

Questions & Answers

Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data

Will 393.106(a) put my truck out of service?

No—not automatically. Across our 13 million inspection records, 393.106(a) citations resulted in out-of-service placement 27.3% of the time. This is below the all-FMCSR average OOS rate of 31.4%, meaning inspectors cited this violation but allowed continued operation in roughly 3 out of 4 cases. However, that 27.3% rate means there's still a meaningful risk of being pulled from service. The decision depends on how severe the inspector judges the cargo securement risk at the time of inspection.

How many CSA points is 393.106(a)?

393.106(a) carries a severity weight of 5. CSA applies this base weight within a 30-day rolling window—if you receive multiple violations within 30 days, the weight multiplies. So a single 393.106(a) citation is 5 points on the Vehicle Maintenance BASIC. Multiple citations in a month will compound that score. The actual impact to your CSA percentile depends on your carrier's total inspection history and other violations.

What do I do right after getting cited for 393.106(a)?

  1. Document the citation. Get the inspector's written description and photos of what they found.
  2. Inspect the headerboard/bulkhead. Verify whether it's truly missing, inadequate, or properly installed.
  3. Repair or replace immediately. If the bulkhead is missing or damaged, fix it before your next load.
  4. Request a re-inspection. If you believe the citation was wrong, ask the inspection facility for an OSV contact to arrange a follow-up.
  5. File a DataQs challenge if warranted. If the finding was factually incorrect, you can contest it through the FMCSA's DataQs system within the regulatory period.

Is 393.106(a) serious compared to other cargo or maintenance violations?

Relatively speaking, no. Among peer codes in the Vehicle Maintenance category, 393.106(a) has a lower out-of-service rate (27.3%) than general inspection/repair violations like 396.3(a)(1) at 45.3% OOS rate. However, it ranks #1763 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by all-time citation volume, suggesting it's rarely cited. The rarity means inspectors take it seriously when they do flag it—it's not a routine write-up. Cargo securement failures can cause accidents and cargo spills, so fix it promptly.

Can I contest 393.106(a) through DataQs?

Yes. If you believe the citation is factually incorrect, you can file a DataQs (Data Quality System) challenge through the FMCSA within 90 days of the citation. DataQs is designed for contested inspection findings—equipment defects, driver violations, and documentation errors. Submit evidence: photos, maintenance records, or proof of repair. DataQs accepts both driver and carrier submissions. Note that DataQs cannot overturn an inspector's judgment call about whether a bulkhead is "inadequate"—only whether the facts (missing, present, etc.) are wrong.

How many 393.106(a) citations happen each month?

Very few. Our inspection database records 33 all-time citations for 393.106(a), with 0 citations in the last 12 months and 0 in the last 90 days. This makes it one of the rarest vehicle maintenance violations on record. The rarity reflects either strong compliance with cargo securement rules or inconsistent enforcement. Either way, if you are cited, you're in a small group—and the violation is likely to draw serious attention from your carrier or your FMCSA compliance file.

What vehicle makes get cited most for 393.106(a)?

Across all citations in our data, FREIGHTLINER and VOLVO trucks account for 2 citations each. All other cited makes (HYUNDAI, KENWORTH, PETERBILT, and trailer types) have 1 citation each. The sample is too small to draw meaningful conclusions about which vehicle types are at higher risk. Cargo securement failures depend more on how a truck is loaded and maintained than on its make. Focus on proper bulkhead maintenance and inspection regardless of your equipment type.

Is this a driver violation or a carrier violation?

Both. Under FMCSA CSA scoring, vehicle maintenance violations like 393.106(a) count against both the driver's record and the carrier's Vehicle Maintenance BASIC if the driver is operating under that carrier at the time of inspection. The violation appears on the inspection report in both names. That said, responsibility for bulkhead condition typically falls on the carrier's maintenance program. As a driver, you can protect yourself by conducting a pre-trip inspection and refusing to haul with defective or missing cargo securement equipment.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T16:04:53.227Z Answers reference TruckCodex inspection data Read the full article → Fleet FAQ →

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.