What happens when you get cited for damaged cargo securement? Direct answers on out-of-service risk, CSA points, repair urgency, and enforcement trends from 13M+ inspections.
Ranks #2,215 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 50.0% is above the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Violation Description
Use of tiedown with improper repair.
Questions & Answers
Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data
Will 393.104F2 put my truck out of service?
Not necessarily. Across our inspection records, 393.104F2 citations resulted in an out-of-service placement 44.4% of the time—higher than the 31.4% national average for all FMCSR codes. Of the 9 total citations in our database, 4 trucks were pulled out of service and 5 were not. The deciding factor is usually the inspector's judgment about whether the damaged tiedown poses an immediate safety risk to cargo or other vehicles. If your tiedown can't perform its intended function, expect a higher likelihood of OOS.
How many CSA points is 393.104F2?
This violation carries a severity weight of 6 points in the CSA system. CSA points accumulate over a rolling 12-month period, and your carrier may face additional scrutiny if multiple violations stack up. One citation won't necessarily trigger intervention, but repeated cargo securement issues signal a pattern that can invite closer audits. The 6-point weight reflects the safety-critical nature of keeping cargo properly contained during transport.
What do I do right after getting cited for 393.104F2?
Immediate steps:
Document the damage. Take photos of the defective tiedown from multiple angles before it's removed.
Do not operate with damaged securement. If OOS was issued, stay parked until repair is complete.
Repair or replace the tiedown. Get a qualified mechanic to verify the fix meets FMCSR 393.104 standards.
Request re-inspection if OOS was placed. An inspector must sign off before you move again.
Report to your carrier's safety team. They need to document this for their maintenance records and CSA file.
Keep repair receipts. You may need proof of correction if the citation is disputed.
Is 393.104F2 serious compared to other maintenance codes?
Yes, it's more serious than most vehicle maintenance violations. Our data shows 393.104F2 has a 44.4% out-of-service rate, well above peer codes like inoperable lamps (393.9 at 6.9% OOS) and lighting/reflectors (393.11 at 1.8% OOS). However, it ranks lower in enforcement volume: 393.104F2 had only 9 all-time citations versus 180,097 for 393.9. This means damaged tiedowns are cited less often but taken more seriously when found. Cargo securement defects directly endanger other motorists, so inspectors enforce them with high OOS rates.
Can I dispute a 393.104F2 citation through DataQs?
Yes. If you believe the citation was issued in error—for example, the inspector misidentified the condition of the tiedown or failed to document the actual defect—you can file a Request for Data Reconsideration (RDR) through DataQs within your carrier's CSA portal. Equipment condition findings like this one are contestable if you have photographic or maintenance records proving the tiedown was functional at the time of inspection. Provide repair dates, photos of the corrected equipment, and maintenance logs. FMCSA reviews the evidence and may remove or downgrade the citation if you demonstrate compliance.
Where is 393.104F2 cited most often?
Over the last 180 days, Texas was the only state with recorded citations for this violation—2 citations, 1 of which resulted in an out-of-service placement (50% OOS rate). Our inspection database has limited geographic concentration for 393.104F2, meaning this violation is relatively uncommon nationwide. Texas's higher visibility may reflect the volume of freight movement through the state, but the small sample size (just 2 recent citations) makes regional patterns hard to establish. Most enforcement is sporadic across multiple states.
How urgent is it to fix a 393.104F2 violation?
Very urgent. In the last 90 days, we recorded 0 citations for 393.104F2, but over the past 12 months there were 3. The low recent volume doesn't mean the risk is low—it means inspectors are actively seeking out damaged tiedowns and stopping trucks on sight. If you were cited, the repair is non-negotiable before further operation. The 44.4% out-of-service rate tells you inspectors treat cargo securement defects as safety-critical. A damaged tiedown can shift or fall during transit, causing accidents or property damage. Fix it immediately after citation.
Does 393.104F2 follow the driver or the carrier in my CSA record?
This violation is recorded against your carrier's CSA file, not your personal driver record. Under FMCSA rules, vehicle maintenance and equipment violations are safety events tied to the motor carrier's operations. However, if you were the driver cited, the citation documents your involvement, and your carrier may flag this on your internal safety history or logbook. Repeated cargo securement violations by the same driver can affect your standing with the carrier. The CSA points accrue to your employer's Maintenance BASIC, which can trigger compliance reviews and potential Out-of-Service Orders for the entire fleet if the category score is high enough.
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the
Source registry
for dataset-level coverage and the
Freshness log
for last-import timestamps.
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
Refreshed weekly.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada.
Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.