Direct answers about 390.403B3 citations: OOS risk, repair timeline, and what happens next based on 13M+ inspection records.
Ranks #2,375 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.
Using a lease or interchange agreement that fails to include the specific duration of the arrangement as required.
Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data
No. Across our inspection database, 390.403B3 has a 0.0% out-of-service rate—all 6 citations in our records resulted in warnings or citations only, never OOS placement. For context, the average FMCSR code triggers an out-of-service order 31.4% of the time, so this violation is among the least likely to sideline your truck immediately.
Not compared to other FMCSR codes. This ranks #2357 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation frequency, with only 6 all-time citations in our 13 million-record database. Peer administrative codes like 390.21TB2-DOT (74,663 citations) are cited far more often. The 0.0% OOS rate also indicates inspectors view it as documentation or compliance-level, not safety-critical.
First, document exactly what the inspector cited. Review your vehicle's inspection records and administrative files to understand the violation. If other defects were found in the same inspection—our data shows brake system, steering, lamp, and hood issues sometimes co-occur—address those first, as they may carry OOS risk. Then contact your carrier's safety manager or your dispatcher within 24 hours to file any needed corrective action or dispute through DataQs if you believe the citation is inaccurate.
Just 1 citation in the last 90 days, appearing in our most recent data snapshot. This extremely low frequency suggests the violation is either rare in practice or easily prevented. Over the last 12 months, we've recorded 3 citations total, with 2 occurring in December 2025.
Texas is the only state with recent enforcement. In the last 180 days, Texas recorded 3 citations for 390.403B3, all without out-of-service placement. The low national citation volume means enforcement is sporadic; you're more likely to encounter this violation in Texas than elsewhere, but the odds remain very low.
Yes. Any roadside inspection citation can be challenged through the DataQs dispute process if you believe the finding is inaccurate, unsupported by evidence, or recorded in error. DataQs allows you to submit documentation and objections within a set timeline. Contact your carrier's compliance team or FMCSA directly for the current filing window and process details specific to your citation.
Low urgency for out-of-service risk, but address it promptly to avoid repeat citations. Only 1 citation appeared in the last 90 days, signaling this is not a widespread enforcement priority. However, if your carrier or state is tracking compliance trends, resolving the underlying issue within 30 days is standard best practice and may help your safety record.
Our data shows Kenworth trucks (KW) account for 2 of the 6 all-time citations, followed by Hino, International, and utility vehicles with 1 citation each. No specific vehicle model or year pattern emerges, suggesting the violation occurs across diverse truck types and is not model-dependent.
Where 390.403B3 is most commonly cited (last 180 days)
TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.
Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.
Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).
Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.
TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.