390.19TG Citation: What It Means & What Happens Next

Cited for 390.19TG? Our 13M+ inspection records show this is a non-serious violation. Learn what triggered it, how enforcement works, and how to avoid it.

Severity Weight
N/A
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
General/Admin
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
390.19TG
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
General/Admin
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
N/A

Ranks #589 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 390.19TG means in plain language

390.19TG is a General/Administrative citation issued when a driver or carrier fails to maintain or display required documentation or identification on a commercial motor vehicle. The regulation requires that certain records, certificates, or markings be present and accessible during roadside inspection.

This is fundamentally a compliance and record-keeping violation. It doesn't involve safety defects, mechanical failure, or driver conduct—it's about having the right paperwork or documentation in the right place when an officer requests it. Common triggers include missing, expired, or improperly filed documents that federal motor carrier safety rules require you to carry.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across our 13 million+ real roadside inspection records, 390.19TG has been cited 1,468 times all-time, with 1,135 citations in the last 12 months and 287 in the last 90 days. The code ranks #614 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by citation volume—making it a mid-range violation in enforcement frequency.

Here's what matters most: 390.19TG has never resulted in an out-of-service order. Across all 1,468 citations in our database, the OOS rate is 0.0%. This stands in sharp contrast to the all-FMCSR average OOS rate of 31.4%, meaning this violation is treated as a non-serious compliance matter. You will not be pulled from service for a 390.19TG citation, though you will receive a warning or citation that goes on your record.

Enforcement has been rising steadily. Our data shows a clear upward trend from April 2025 (31 citations) through March 2026 (140 citations), with August through October 2025 each hitting roughly 108–111 citations. This suggests heightened inspection focus on documentation compliance during that period.

Who gets cited most

New York leads by a significant margin. Across the last 180 days, our inspection records show 141 citations in NY, 64 in Louisiana, and 49 in Massachusetts. All three states maintain a 0.0% OOS rate on this code, consistent with the national pattern.

Wisconsin (48 citations), Pennsylvania (42 citations), and Kansas (38 citations) round out the top enforcement jurisdictions, each also with zero out-of-service placements. The concentration in the Northeast and Upper Midwest suggests that regional inspection priorities or seasonal operations may drive citation density.

Regarding carriers, our data shows fleets such as Suplicium Transport LLC with 9 citations and Jordin Fountain Logging LLC with 6 citations appearing most frequently in our records. This does not indicate systematic non-compliance—it likely reflects fleet size, inspection frequency, or geographic footprint rather than negligence.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

390.19TG sits in the General/Admin category alongside several higher-volume peers. For context:

  • 390.21TB2-DOT has 74,663 all-time citations with a 0.0% OOS rate
  • 390.21T(b) has 61,097 all-time citations with a 0.0% OOS rate
  • 390.21TB1-MC has 59,189 all-time citations with a 0.0% OOS rate

All three of these peer codes also maintain zero OOS placement, confirming that documentation and marking violations across this regulatory family are consistently treated as non-serious. The difference is volume: those codes are cited tens of thousands more times, suggesting they address more common compliance gaps. 390.19TG's lower citation count may reflect a narrower or more specific documentation requirement.

How to avoid it

Our inspection data reveals patterns worth noting. The code most frequently co-occurs with 392.2-SLLUCR (Operating a CMV while ill or fatigued), appearing together in 153 shared inspections over the last 90 days. This suggests that documentation gaps are often discovered during longer or more intensive inspections, which may occur when fatigue-related concerns arise. Keep yourself rested and alert—thorough inspections uncover everything.

391.41APC (Medical Certificate violations) appeared in 70 shared inspections with 390.19TG, indicating that missing or invalid medical certificates trigger both codes simultaneously. Verify your medical certificate is current, signed, and on file with your state licensing agency before every trip.

396.17C-PI (No proof of periodic inspection) co-occurred 67 times, meaning missing vehicle inspection documentation is a common pairing. Carry proof of your last periodic inspection and ensure your records are complete and accessible.

Based on vehicle data, Ford units account for 203 citations on this code, followed by Freightliner (149) and Isuzu (96). This likely reflects their prevalence in the commercial fleet rather than inherent compliance risk, but it underscores that every truck type requires the same documentation rigor.

Before every trip:

  • Verify your medical certificate is valid and on file; check expiration dates
  • Confirm your vehicle's most recent periodic inspection documentation is aboard the truck
  • Review all required placards, markings, and USDOT number displays on the exterior
  • Keep a clear, organized folder with licenses, endorsements, certifications, and inspection records
  • Double-check that all documents are legible and current, not worn or faded
  • If operating under a company, ensure your carrier's registration and authority documents are accessible

This violation is almost never out-of-service, but it's a friction point in inspections. Clean, complete documentation speeds up inspections and keeps your record clean.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T14:01:31.404Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 390.19TG Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 390.19TG is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. New York
98
OOS 0.0%
2. Pennsylvania
78
OOS 0.0%
3. Massachusetts
56
OOS 0.0%
4. Louisiana
49
OOS 0.0%
5. Alabama
44
OOS 0.0%
6. Kansas
34
OOS 0.0%
7. New Jersey
25
OOS 0.0%
8. Wisconsin
24
OOS 0.0%
9. Florida
19
OOS 0.0%
10. Michigan
19
OOS 0.0%
11. Nevada
15
OOS 0.0%
12. Colorado
11
OOS 0.0%
13. Vermont
10
OOS 0.0%
14. Connecticut
10
OOS 0.0%
15. Utah
9
OOS 0.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.