FMCSR 177.834J: Manholes and valves not closed or leak free

Got cited for 177.834J? Our data shows an 82.1% out-of-service rate on this hazmat violation. Here's what it means and what happens next.

OOS Eligible
Severity Weight
4
OOS Eligible
Yes
BASIC Category
Hazardous Materials
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
177.834J
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Hazardous Materials
OOS Eligible:
Yes
Severity Weight:
4
Violation Group:
Cargo Protection - HM

Ranks #1,403 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 81.7% is above the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Manholes and valves not closed or leak free

In-Depth Explainer

Grounded in TruckCodex roadside-inspection data

What 177.834J means in plain language

When you transport hazardous materials in a tanker or bulk container, every opening on that tank—including manholes and valve connections—must be securely closed and completely free of leaks. This rule exists because any escape of hazmat during transit creates immediate risk to public safety, the environment, and your cargo.

The requirement covers both the physical closure (the cap, plug, or cover must be in place and tight) and the seal integrity (no drips, seeps, or visible escapes around the connection points). A valve that's weeping hazmat or a manhole cover that's not fully sealed are both violations. Inspectors check these during roadside inspections by visual inspection and, in some cases, by checking for product residue or active leakage.

This isn't a warning-level violation. Our inspection records show this code is treated as a serious structural and safety defect that directly affects your vehicle's fitness to operate.

What our enforcement data actually shows

Across 13 million inspections in our database, officers have cited 177.834J 112 times all-time, with 59 citations in the last 12 months and 9 in the last 90 days. This ranks the code #1385 of 3,036 FMCSR violations by frequency—a relatively uncommon citation, but one that carries outsized consequences.

The enforcement picture is stark: 82.1% of citations result in out-of-service placement. That means 92 of the 112 vehicles cited were immediately removed from service. For context, the all-FMCSR average out-of-service rate is 31.4%, making 177.834J citations nearly 2.6 times more likely to result in a roadside takeout than the typical violation.

The trend in the last 90 days shows 9 citations with seasonal variation—June and July 2025 both saw 7 citations each, while March 2026 had 3. This suggests the violation occurs year-round, not tied to a single season.

Who gets cited most

Our data from the last 180 days shows Texas dominates citation volume with 22 citations, compared to just 1 each in Iowa, Illinois, and New Mexico. Within Texas, the out-of-service rate was 81.8%, consistent with the national pattern.

Among carriers, our data shows fleets such as Pennco Transport Inc, South Haven Trucking LLC, Transportes Humec LLC, and Transportes Nari SA de CV, each with 3 citations all-time. Multiple other carriers appear with 2 citations each. This distribution suggests the violation is not concentrated in a single fleet operation but scattered across different haulers, indicating that compliance gaps exist across the industry.

Vehicle makes most frequently cited include Freightliner (23 citations), Peterbilt (20), Kenworth (20), and various specialty tanker units. If you operate one of these common tractor models pulling tanker trailers, heightened pre-trip attention to tank closures is warranted.

How severe is this compared to similar codes

Within the hazardous materials category, 177.834J sits in the middle of the severity spectrum by citation volume but at the high end by enforcement rigor.

General loading and unloading hazmat violations—177.834A-HMC and 177.834(a)—appear far more frequently (3,954 and 3,839 citations respectively) and carry even higher out-of-service rates (99.2% and 97.9%). Placarding violations like 177.817(a) occur more often (2,274 citations) but with a lower 75.1% OOS rate. Movement of damaged hazmat packages (177.823(a)) shows 1,829 citations but only a 51.8% OOS rate.

The fact that 177.834J's 82.1% out-of-service rate exceeds most peer codes underscores that inspector discretion on this violation typically results in immediate removal—likely because an open or leaking tank is considered an active hazard rather than a documentation or labeling problem.

How to avoid it

Based on the co-occurring violations and vehicle patterns in our data, here are concrete pre-trip and maintenance actions:

  • Inspect all tank closures before every departure. Walk around the entire tank unit. Visually confirm every manhole cover is seated flush, every valve is in the closed position, and there are no visible drips or wet patches around connection points. Spend 30 seconds per closure point—this is the single most effective prevention.

  • Check valve threads and gaskets for wear or damage. If a valve won't close fully or the seal appears cracked, corroded, or degraded, do not load and haul. Mark the unit for maintenance immediately. Valve replacement or repair is far cheaper than an 82% OOS rate and lost revenue.

  • Verify caps and plugs are rated for your load. Some tanks use quick-disconnects or plug-style closures. Ensure caps are correctly sized and properly threaded for each manhole. Mismatched or cross-threaded caps will leak under road vibration.

  • Perform a leak-check after loading. Before you leave the shipper's facility, walk the tank again. Any visible weeping or odor around closed valves is a red flag to offload and fix the problem on-site rather than risk a roadside stop.

  • Address glazing, tire, and general vehicle defects promptly. Our data shows that 177.834J citations sometimes co-occur with window obstruction (393.60C), tire issues (393.75A3), and brake problems (396.3A1B). A well-maintained truck overall is less likely to have hidden tank integrity issues. Regular DOT inspections catch these gaps before roadside.

  • Keep maintenance records for tank seals and valves. If cited, documented routine inspection and maintenance of closures strengthens your response and prevents recurrence.

If you've been cited for 177.834J, the vehicle is almost certainly out of service pending repair. Do not attempt to re-load or move the unit. Have a qualified tank inspector or the tank manufacturer verify all closures and seals before returning to service. The 82.1% out-of-service rate reflects the seriousness with which regulators treat this violation—take it seriously.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T15:24:38.073Z Based on TruckCodex inspection data See 177.834J Q&A → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 177.834J is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. Texas
11
OOS 72.7%
2. Illinois
1
OOS 100.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.