FMCSR 172.328(c): QT/NQT Marking on Cargo Tanks

What happens when a cargo tank isn't marked QT or NQT? Direct answers from 18 citations in our inspection database.

Severity Weight
5
OOS Eligible
No
BASIC Category
Hazardous Materials
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
172.328(c)
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Hazardous Materials
OOS Eligible:
No
Severity Weight:
5
Violation Group:
Markings - HM

Ranks #2,019 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 0.0% is below the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Not marked with "QT" or "NQT" on MC330 or MC331 cargo tank

Questions & Answers

Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data

Will 172.328(c) put my truck out of service?

No. Across our 13 million inspection records, this violation has never resulted in an out-of-service order. Our data shows 18 all-time citations for this code, and 0 out-of-service placements—a 0.0% OOS rate. By contrast, the average FMCSR violation carries a 31.4% OOS rate, so this code is significantly less severe in enforcement practice.

What does 172.328(c) actually mean for my MC330 or MC331 tank?

Your cargo tank must display either a QT (for quart) or NQT (for non-quart) marking to indicate the volumetric standard it meets. This marking is required on MC330 and MC331 specification tanks under hazmat regulations. The marking identifies the tank's design and capacity classification, which is critical for hazmat handlers to confirm compliance during loading and transport.

Is 172.328(c) a serious hazmat violation compared to other cargo tank rules?

No—it's among the least-cited hazmat violations in our database. Across inspection records, we see 18 all-time citations. Compare this to related hazmat codes: general loading/unloading violations (177.834A-HMC) have 3,954 citations with 99.2% OOS rate, and placarding violations (177.817(a)) have 2,274 citations with 75.1% OOS rate. At 0.0% OOS, 172.328(c) enforcement is minimal and low-severity.

What should I do immediately after being cited for 172.328(c)?

  1. Verify the marking: Inspect your MC330 or MC331 tank for visible QT or NQT designation. 2. Document the current state: Take photos showing the exact location and condition of any markings. 3. Check tank documentation: Pull your tank specifications and manufacturer records to confirm which marking class it belongs to. 4. Contact your carrier's safety team: Report the citation and ask whether the tank needs re-marking or certification. 5. Respond to the citation: Gather evidence of compliance or remediation for any DataQs appeal if you believe the inspector misidentified the marking.

Can I challenge a 172.328(c) citation through DataQs?

Yes. DataQs is the FMCSA's system for drivers and carriers to contest roadside inspection findings. Since 172.328(c) involves a visible marking on equipment, you can challenge the citation if: the inspector missed an existing QT or NQT mark, the mark was obscured or illegible but present, or you have documentation proving the tank's design standard. Submit photos, tank certification documents, and a clear explanation of why the violation finding was incorrect. The FMCSA reviews and either upholds or removes the citation.

How many times has 172.328(c) been cited in the last year?

Zero citations in the last 12 months, and zero in the last 90 days. Our inspection records show this violation is extremely rare in current enforcement. The 18 all-time citations span a much longer historical period, placing this code at #1988 out of 3,036 FMCSR codes by total citation volume. This suggests inspectors rarely encounter unmarked tanks or this marking is becoming less common.

Which carriers have been cited most for 172.328(c)?

Across our 13 million roadside inspection records, PLANTA EMBOTELLADORA CRESPOS GAS INC (USDOT 2496871) has the most citations for this code, with 2 all-time. Nine other carriers have one citation each, including MAIN BROTHERS OIL CO INC, HAROLD A PURYEAR TRUCKING CO INC, WILLIAM J INGRAM FUELS INC, QUALITY ENERGY INC, CALIFORNIA GAS TRANSPORT INC, CLEVELAND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS INC, CO2 SERVICES INC, TOMAHAWK TRUCKING INC, and SELECT WATER SOLUTIONS LLC. The low frequency suggests this is not a widespread compliance problem in the industry.

How urgent is fixing a 172.328(c) violation?

Not urgent from an enforcement standpoint, but address it before your next inspection. Because this code has never triggered an out-of-service order and shows zero citations in 90 days, FMCSA is not actively targeting it. However, having a proper QT or NQT marking is a compliance requirement. Coordinate with your carrier to verify the tank's design specification and ensure the correct marking is visible and legible. This is a low-risk, straightforward fix that prevents future citations.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T16:28:05.002Z Answers reference TruckCodex inspection data Read the full article → Fleet FAQ →

Data sources & freshness

TruckCodex aggregates official public-sector datasets. See the Source registry for dataset-level coverage and the Freshness log for last-import timestamps.

Census, SAFER, SMS, Licensing & Insurance (L&I), roadside inspections, crashes, and authority history.

Refreshed daily.

Vehicle recall campaigns, defect investigations, and consumer safety complaints (SCRS).

Refreshed daily.
EIA

Retail diesel and gasoline price history and state fuel-tax tables.

Refreshed weekly.

Cross-border carrier registry and Canadian recall campaigns where applicable.

Refreshed weekly.

TruckCodex is an independent aggregator; it is not affiliated with FMCSA, NHTSA, EIA, or Transport Canada. Always verify compliance-critical information directly with the originating agency.