393.110B1-C Cargo Securement Citations — Driver Q&A

What 393.110B1-C means, OOS rates, CSA points, and what to do after citation. Data from 13M+ inspections.

OOS Eligible
Severity Weight
3
OOS Eligible
Yes
BASIC Category
Vehicle Maintenance
Code System
FMCSR
Code:
393.110B1-C
Code System:
FMCSR
BASIC Category:
Vehicle Maintenance
OOS Eligible:
Yes
Severity Weight:
3
Violation Group:
Tiedown

Ranks #573 of 3,146 FMCSR codes by citation frequency • OOS rate of 98.9% is above the FMCSR-wide average of 33.3%.

Violation Description

Cargo - Insufficient tiedowns (w/o headerboard/blocking) for article(s) of cargo 5 feet or less and 1,100 lbs. or less.

Questions & Answers

Direct answers grounded in TruckCodex inspection data

Will 393.110B1-C put my truck out of service?

Yes — almost certainly. Our inspection records show a 98.8% out-of-service rate for 393.110B1-C citations across all-time data (1,539 out of 1,558 total citations resulted in OOS placement). This is far above the FMCSR average OOS rate of 31.4%. In the past 90 days, 230 citations resulted in 230 OOS placements. You should expect your vehicle to be placed out of service on the spot during a roadside inspection for unsecured logs.

How many CSA points is 393.110B1-C?

This violation carries a severity weight of 7 points. CSA scoring multiplies the severity weight by 7 for violations cited within the last 30 days. That means a single recent citation could add up to 49 points to your carrier's CSA score, which factors into the Safety and Maintenance BASIC. For drivers, this violation follows you and your employer on the CSA profile.

What do I do right now after getting cited for 393.110B1-C?

Immediate steps:

  1. Do not move the vehicle until logs are properly secured per FMCSR standards.
  2. Document the securement method and corrective action taken with photos.
  3. Request a re-inspection once corrected.
  4. Review your cargo securement procedures — our data shows 393.110B1-C often appears alongside other securement failures (393.104B-C, 393.100B-C) and inspection violations (396.17C-PI) in the same roadside stop.
  5. Notify your dispatcher and safety manager immediately.

Do not resume operation until cleared by the inspector.

Is 393.110B1-C a serious violation compared to other cargo securement codes?

Yes. At a 98.8% OOS rate, 393.110B1-C is significantly more severe than the FMCSR average of 31.4%. Among peer vehicle-maintenance codes in our database, codes like 393.9 (Inoperable lamps) have only a 6.9% OOS rate and 396.17C-PI (No proof of inspection) has 0.0%. Your logs violation is treated as an immediate safety hazard requiring vehicle removal from service almost every single time it is cited.

Can I contest or DataQs a 393.110B1-C citation?

Yes, you can file a Request for Data Review (RDR) through FMCSA's DataQs portal, but success depends on whether the citation was factual. If the inspector documented unsecured logs but your securement actually complied with FMCSR standards, you have grounds to contest. Gather evidence: photos of the load at the time of citation, securement diagrams, tiedown condition, and weight distribution data. If the finding is purely observational (inspector saw loose logs), contestation is harder. Consult your carrier's safety or compliance team for support in filing.

What states have the most 393.110B1-C citations?

Over the last 180 days, our records show the highest citation counts in: California (121 citations, 97.5% OOS rate), Florida (39 citations, 100% OOS rate), and Washington (28 citations, 100% OOS rate). Together these three states account for 188 of the 332 citations we tracked in the most recent six-month period. If you operate in California, extra vigilance on cargo securement is critical.

How urgent is it to fix 393.110B1-C compliance issues?

Very urgent. In the last 90 days alone, 230 citations for unsecured logs were issued — a significant enforcement activity. The past 12 months show consistent pressure: August 2025 saw 97 citations, March 2026 had 124 citations. Nearly every citation results in immediate OOS placement, meaning your truck sits idle until corrected. Lost revenue plus repair downtime makes prevention far cheaper than remediation. Audit your load securement procedures, tiedown condition (we see 393.104B-C co-occur 22 times in 90 days), and driver training now.

What causes 393.110B1-C citations most often, and should I worry about my vehicle type?

Unsecured logs are cited across many vehicle types, but our data shows Ford (216 citations all-time) and Freightliner (203 citations) are the most commonly cited makes — likely because these are popular commercial platforms, not because they fail more often. The violation appears frequently alongside damaged tiedowns (393.104B-C, 393.104F3), missing equipment (393.95A1, 393.95F), and driver fatigue flags (392.2). Any vehicle can be cited; focus on proper securement regardless of make or model.

Last updated: 2026-04-20T13:58:53.782Z Answers reference TruckCodex inspection data Read the full article → Fleet FAQ →

Top Enforcing States

Where 393.110B1-C is most commonly cited (last 180 days)

1. California
86
OOS 98.8%
2. Florida
34
OOS 100.0%
3. Maryland
26
OOS 100.0%
4. Tennessee
18
OOS 100.0%
5. Pennsylvania
16
OOS 100.0%
6. Arizona
15
OOS 100.0%
7. Texas
15
OOS 93.3%
8. New Hampshire
10
OOS 100.0%
9. New Jersey
9
OOS 100.0%
10. Arkansas
9
OOS 100.0%
11. Delaware
8
OOS 100.0%
12. North Carolina
8
OOS 100.0%
13. Colorado
8
OOS 100.0%
14. New York
7
OOS 100.0%
15. Iowa
7
OOS 100.0%

Often Cited Together

Other violations commonly found on the same inspection (last 90 days)